linux-kernel - Re: include/linux/unaligned/be_byteshift.h:46:19: error: redefinition of 'get_unaligned

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CACRpkda5ofCs=nkpZXVyekw2LoeYZUNrFTu1iGPt47ZSMa-6eg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 22 Mar 2021 14:33:46 +0100
From:   Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Cc:     kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        ALSA Development Mailing List <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>,
        kbuild-all@...ts.01.org,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: include/linux/unaligned/be_byteshift.h:46:19: error: redefinition
 of 'get_unaligned_be32'

On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 10:57 AM Andy Shevchenko
<andy.shevchenko@...il.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 9:05 AM kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Linus,
> >
> > FYI, the error/warning still remains.
(...)
> >    In file included from include/linux/build_bug.h:5,
> >                     from include/linux/bitfield.h:10,
> >                     from drivers/iio/magnetometer/yamaha-yas530.c:22:
>
> Isn't it fixed already somewhere?

It is, I think Jonathan already applied the fix, it is just waiting to
percolate up
to Greg and then to Torvals:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iio/20210221154511.75b3d8a6@archlinux/

>> Kconfig warnings: (for reference only)
>>    WARNING: unmet direct dependencies detected for SND_ATMEL_SOC_PDC
>>    Depends on SOUND && !UML && SND && SND_SOC && SND_ATMEL_SOC && HAS_DMA
>>    Selected by
>>    - SND_ATMEL_SOC_SSC && SOUND && !UML && SND && SND_SOC && SND_ATMEL_SOC
>>    - SND_ATMEL_SOC_SSC_PDC && SOUND && !UML && SND && SND_SOC && SND_ATMEL_SOC && ATMEL_SSC
>
> This one though is interesting.

This looks like nothing to me :/
As confused as ever about Kconfig.

Yours,
Linus Walleij