lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YFikbJfytBSqBPDU@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date:   Mon, 22 Mar 2021 15:06:36 +0100
From:   Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:     Jessica Yu <jeyu@...nel.org>
Cc:     Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>, x86@...nel.org,
        jbaron@...mai.com, ardb@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        sumit.garg@...aro.org, oliver.sang@...el.com, jarkko@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] static_call: Fix static_call_update() sanity check

On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 02:07:54PM +0100, Jessica Yu wrote:
> +++ Steven Rostedt [19/03/21 14:00 -0400]:
> > On Fri, 19 Mar 2021 13:57:38 +0100
> > Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> > 
> > > Jessica, can you explain how !MODULE_UNLOAD is supposed to work?
> > > Alternatives, jump_labels and static_call all can have relocations into
> > > __exit code. Not loading it at all would be BAD.
> > 
> > According to the description:
> > 
> > " Without this option you will not be able to unload any
> >  modules (note that some modules may not be unloadable anyway), which
> >  makes your kernel smaller, faster and simpler.
> >  If unsure, say Y."
> > 
> > Seems there's no reason to load the "exit" portion, as that's what makes it
> > "smaller".
> 
> Exactly. If you disable MODULE_UNLOAD, then you don't intend to ever
> unload any modules, and so you'll never end up calling the module's
> cleanup/exit function. That code would basically be never used, so
> that's why it's not loaded in the first place.

As explained, that's broken. Has always been for as long as we've had
alternatives.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ