[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210322154735.GA2079192@infradead.org>
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2021 15:47:35 +0000
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>
Cc: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Chaitanya Kulkarni <chaitanya.kulkarni@....com>,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>,
Bodo Stroesser <bstroesser@...fujitsu.com>,
"Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@...radead.org>,
Guoqing Jiang <guoqing.jiang@...ud.ionos.com>,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, target-devel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] target: pscsi: avoid Wempty-body warning
On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 12:44:34PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
>
> Building with 'make W=1' shows a harmless warning for pscsi:
>
> drivers/target/target_core_pscsi.c: In function 'pscsi_complete_cmd':
> drivers/target/target_core_pscsi.c:624:33: error: suggest braces around empty body in an 'if' statement [-Werror=empty-body]
> 624 | ; /* XXX: TCM_LOGICAL_UNIT_COMMUNICATION_FAILURE */
> | ^
>
> Rework the coding style as suggested by gcc to avoid the warning.
I would much, much prefer to drop the bogus warning;
if (foo)
; /* comment */
is a fairly usual and absolutely sensible style. The warning on hte
other hand is completely stupid.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists