[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YFjBoZJBnAqDh+jY@kroah.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2021 17:11:13 +0100
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Fabio Aiuto <fabioaiuto83@...il.com>
Cc: joe@...ches.com, apw@...onical.com, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/11] staging: rtl8723bs: remove argument in
recv_indicatepkts_pkt_loss_cnt
On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 03:31:43PM +0100, Fabio Aiuto wrote:
> remove debug_priv argument so function prototype can be
> easily moved away
>
> Signed-off-by: Fabio Aiuto <fabioaiuto83@...il.com>
> ---
> drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_recv.c | 11 ++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_recv.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_recv.c
> index 9ef2408ded57..e2a6afed723c 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_recv.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_recv.c
> @@ -1983,13 +1983,13 @@ int enqueue_reorder_recvframe(struct recv_reorder_ctrl *preorder_ctrl, union rec
>
> }
>
> -void recv_indicatepkts_pkt_loss_cnt(struct debug_priv *pdbgpriv, u64 prev_seq, u64 current_seq);
> -void recv_indicatepkts_pkt_loss_cnt(struct debug_priv *pdbgpriv, u64 prev_seq, u64 current_seq)
> +u64 recv_indicatepkts_pkt_loss_cnt(u64 prev_seq, u64 current_seq);
But you did not drop the function prototype, why keep it?
And shouldn't this be static?
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists