| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CAHbLzkrnfC8xcXhbgFpN4azZm5zEr0WO_JaBR-OTMsOT4QC4JA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2021 09:29:38 -0700
From: Yang Shi <shy828301@...il.com>
To: Zi Yan <ziy@...dia.com>
Cc: Linux MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
"Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>,
Sandipan Das <sandipan@...ux.ibm.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
Mika Penttila <mika.penttila@...tfour.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] mm: huge_memory: a new debugfs interface for
splitting THP tests.
On Sun, Mar 21, 2021 at 7:11 PM Zi Yan <ziy@...dia.com> wrote:
>
> On 19 Mar 2021, at 19:37, Yang Shi wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 5:52 PM Zi Yan <zi.yan@...t.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> From: Zi Yan <ziy@...dia.com>
> >>
> >> We did not have a direct user interface of splitting the compound page
> >> backing a THP and there is no need unless we want to expose the THP
> >> implementation details to users. Make <debugfs>/split_huge_pages accept
> >> a new command to do that.
> >>
> >> By writing "<pid>,<vaddr_start>,<vaddr_end>" to
> >> <debugfs>/split_huge_pages, THPs within the given virtual address range
> >> from the process with the given pid are split. It is used to test
> >> split_huge_page function. In addition, a selftest program is added to
> >> tools/testing/selftests/vm to utilize the interface by splitting
> >> PMD THPs and PTE-mapped THPs.
> >>
> >> This does not change the old behavior, i.e., writing 1 to the interface
> >> to split all THPs in the system.
> >>
> >> Changelog:
> >>
> >> From v5:
> >> 1. Skipped special VMAs and other fixes. (suggested by Yang Shi)
> >
> > Looks good to me. Reviewed-by: Yang Shi <shy828301@...il.com>
> >
> > Some nits below:
> >
> >>
> >> From v4:
> >> 1. Fixed the error code return issue, spotted by kernel test robot
> >> <lkp@...el.com>.
> >>
> >> From v3:
> >> 1. Factored out split huge pages in the given pid code to a separate
> >> function.
> >> 2. Added the missing put_page for not split pages.
> >> 3. pr_debug -> pr_info, make reading results simpler.
> >>
> >> From v2:
> >> 1. Reused existing <debugfs>/split_huge_pages interface. (suggested by
> >> Yang Shi)
> >>
> >> From v1:
> >> 1. Removed unnecessary calling to vma_migratable, spotted by kernel test
> >> robot <lkp@...el.com>.
> >> 2. Dropped the use of find_mm_struct and code it directly, since there
> >> is no need for the permission check in that function and the function
> >> is only available when migration is on.
> >> 3. Added some comments in the selftest program to clarify how PTE-mapped
> >> THPs are formed.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Zi Yan <ziy@...dia.com>
> >> ---
> >> mm/huge_memory.c | 143 +++++++-
> >> tools/testing/selftests/vm/.gitignore | 1 +
> >> tools/testing/selftests/vm/Makefile | 1 +
> >> .../selftests/vm/split_huge_page_test.c | 318 ++++++++++++++++++
> >> 4 files changed, 456 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> >> create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/vm/split_huge_page_test.c
> >>
> >> diff --git a/mm/huge_memory.c b/mm/huge_memory.c
> >> index bff92dea5ab3..9bf9bc489228 100644
> >> --- a/mm/huge_memory.c
> >> +++ b/mm/huge_memory.c
> >> @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
> >>
> >> #include <linux/mm.h>
> >> #include <linux/sched.h>
> >> +#include <linux/sched/mm.h>
> >> #include <linux/sched/coredump.h>
> >> #include <linux/sched/numa_balancing.h>
> >> #include <linux/highmem.h>
> >> @@ -2922,16 +2923,14 @@ static struct shrinker deferred_split_shrinker = {
> >> };
> >>
> >> #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_FS
> >> -static int split_huge_pages_set(void *data, u64 val)
> >> +static void split_huge_pages_all(void)
> >> {
> >> struct zone *zone;
> >> struct page *page;
> >> unsigned long pfn, max_zone_pfn;
> >> unsigned long total = 0, split = 0;
> >>
> >> - if (val != 1)
> >> - return -EINVAL;
> >> -
> >> + pr_info("Split all THPs\n");
> >> for_each_populated_zone(zone) {
> >> max_zone_pfn = zone_end_pfn(zone);
> >> for (pfn = zone->zone_start_pfn; pfn < max_zone_pfn; pfn++) {
> >> @@ -2959,11 +2958,141 @@ static int split_huge_pages_set(void *data, u64 val)
> >> }
> >>
> >> pr_info("%lu of %lu THP split\n", split, total);
> >> +}
> >>
> >> - return 0;
> >> +static int split_huge_pages_pid(int pid, unsigned long vaddr_start,
> >> + unsigned long vaddr_end)
> >> +{
> >> + int ret = 0;
> >> + struct task_struct *task;
> >> + struct mm_struct *mm;
> >> + unsigned long total = 0, split = 0;
> >> + unsigned long addr;
> >> +
> >> + vaddr_start &= PAGE_MASK;
> >> + vaddr_end &= PAGE_MASK;
> >> +
> >> + /* Find the task_struct from pid */
> >> + rcu_read_lock();
> >> + task = find_task_by_vpid(pid);
> >> + if (!task) {
> >> + rcu_read_unlock();
> >> + ret = -ESRCH;
> >> + goto out;
> >> + }
> >> + get_task_struct(task);
> >> + rcu_read_unlock();
> >> +
> >> + /* Find the mm_struct */
> >> + mm = get_task_mm(task);
> >> + put_task_struct(task);
> >> +
> >> + if (!mm) {
> >> + ret = -EINVAL;
> >> + goto out;
> >> + }
> >> +
> >> + pr_info("Split huge pages in pid: %d, vaddr: [0x%lx - 0x%lx]\n",
> >> + pid, vaddr_start, vaddr_end);
> >> +
> >> + mmap_read_lock(mm);
> >> + /*
> >> + * always increase addr by PAGE_SIZE, since we could have a PTE page
> >> + * table filled with PTE-mapped THPs, each of which is distinct.
> >> + */
> >> + for (addr = vaddr_start; addr < vaddr_end; addr += PAGE_SIZE) {
> >> + struct vm_area_struct *vma = find_vma(mm, addr);
> >> + unsigned int follflags;
> >> + struct page *page;
> >> +
> >> + if (!vma || addr < vma->vm_start)
> >> + break;
> >> +
> >> + /* skip special VMA and hugetlb VMA */
> >> + if (vma_is_special_huge(vma) || is_vm_hugetlb_page(vma)) {
> >
> > VM_IO vma should be skipped as well. And you may extract this into a helper?
>
> Sure. Any name suggestion? :)
How's about not_suitable_for_split() or suitable_for_split()?
>
>
> >> + addr = vma->vm_end;
> >> + continue;
> >> + }
> >> +
> >> + /* FOLL_DUMP to ignore special (like zero) pages */
> >> + follflags = FOLL_GET | FOLL_DUMP;
> >> + page = follow_page(vma, addr, follflags);
> >> +
> >> + if (IS_ERR(page))
> >> + continue;
> >> + if (!page)
> >> + continue;
> >> +
> >> + if (!is_transparent_hugepage(page))
> >> + goto next;
> >> +
> >> + total++;
> >> + if (!can_split_huge_page(compound_head(page), NULL))
> >> + goto next;
> >> +
> >> + if (!trylock_page(page))
> >> + goto next;
> >> +
> >> + if (!split_huge_page(page))
> >> + split++;
> >> +
> >> + unlock_page(page);
> >> +next:
> >> + put_page(page);
> >> + }
> >> + mmap_read_unlock(mm);
> >> + mmput(mm);
> >> +
> >> + pr_info("%lu of %lu THP split\n", split, total);
> >> +
> >> +out:
> >> + return ret;
> >> }
> >> -DEFINE_DEBUGFS_ATTRIBUTE(split_huge_pages_fops, NULL, split_huge_pages_set,
> >> - "%llu\n");
> >> +
> >> +static ssize_t split_huge_pages_write(struct file *file, const char __user *buf,
> >> + size_t count, loff_t *ppops)
> >> +{
> >> + static DEFINE_MUTEX(split_debug_mutex);
> >> + ssize_t ret;
> >> + char input_buf[80]; /* hold pid, start_vaddr, end_vaddr */
> >
> > Why not move buf len macro in the following patch to this patch? Then
> > you don't have to change the length again.
>
> Sure.
>
> Thanks for the comments.
>
> --
> Best Regards,
> Yan Zi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists