[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <0cd2506f598e7095ea43e62dca1f472de5474a0d.1616430991.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2021 16:37:47 +0000 (UTC)
From: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>
To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>, ast@...nel.org,
daniel@...earbox.net, andrii@...nel.org, kafai@...com,
songliubraving@...com, yhs@...com, john.fastabend@...il.com,
kpsingh@...omium.org, naveen.n.rao@...ux.ibm.com,
sandipan@...ux.ibm.com
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/8] powerpc/bpf: Change register numbering for
bpf_set/is_seen_register()
Instead of using BPF register number as input in functions
bpf_set_seen_register() and bpf_is_seen_register(), use
CPU register number directly.
Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>
---
arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c | 16 ++++++++--------
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c
index aaf1a887f653..51b3f440288c 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c
@@ -31,12 +31,12 @@ static inline void bpf_flush_icache(void *start, void *end)
static inline bool bpf_is_seen_register(struct codegen_context *ctx, int i)
{
- return (ctx->seen & (1 << (31 - b2p[i])));
+ return ctx->seen & (1 << (31 - i));
}
static inline void bpf_set_seen_register(struct codegen_context *ctx, int i)
{
- ctx->seen |= (1 << (31 - b2p[i]));
+ ctx->seen |= 1 << (31 - i);
}
static inline bool bpf_has_stack_frame(struct codegen_context *ctx)
@@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ static inline bool bpf_has_stack_frame(struct codegen_context *ctx)
* - the bpf program uses its stack area
* The latter condition is deduced from the usage of BPF_REG_FP
*/
- return ctx->seen & SEEN_FUNC || bpf_is_seen_register(ctx, BPF_REG_FP);
+ return ctx->seen & SEEN_FUNC || bpf_is_seen_register(ctx, b2p[BPF_REG_FP]);
}
/*
@@ -124,11 +124,11 @@ static void bpf_jit_build_prologue(u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx)
* in the protected zone below the previous stack frame
*/
for (i = BPF_REG_6; i <= BPF_REG_10; i++)
- if (bpf_is_seen_register(ctx, i))
+ if (bpf_is_seen_register(ctx, b2p[i]))
PPC_BPF_STL(b2p[i], 1, bpf_jit_stack_offsetof(ctx, b2p[i]));
/* Setup frame pointer to point to the bpf stack area */
- if (bpf_is_seen_register(ctx, BPF_REG_FP))
+ if (bpf_is_seen_register(ctx, b2p[BPF_REG_FP]))
EMIT(PPC_RAW_ADDI(b2p[BPF_REG_FP], 1,
STACK_FRAME_MIN_SIZE + ctx->stack_size));
}
@@ -139,7 +139,7 @@ static void bpf_jit_emit_common_epilogue(u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx
/* Restore NVRs */
for (i = BPF_REG_6; i <= BPF_REG_10; i++)
- if (bpf_is_seen_register(ctx, i))
+ if (bpf_is_seen_register(ctx, b2p[i]))
PPC_BPF_LL(b2p[i], 1, bpf_jit_stack_offsetof(ctx, b2p[i]));
/* Tear down our stack frame */
@@ -330,9 +330,9 @@ static int bpf_jit_build_body(struct bpf_prog *fp, u32 *image,
* any issues.
*/
if (dst_reg >= BPF_PPC_NVR_MIN && dst_reg < 32)
- bpf_set_seen_register(ctx, insn[i].dst_reg);
+ bpf_set_seen_register(ctx, dst_reg);
if (src_reg >= BPF_PPC_NVR_MIN && src_reg < 32)
- bpf_set_seen_register(ctx, insn[i].src_reg);
+ bpf_set_seen_register(ctx, src_reg);
switch (code) {
/*
--
2.25.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists