[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210322164200.GB667925@rowland.harvard.edu>
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2021 12:42:00 -0400
From: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
To: Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] USB: ehci: drop workaround for forced irq threading
On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 12:12:49PM +0100, Johan Hovold wrote:
> Force-threaded interrupt handlers used to run with interrupts enabled,
> something which could lead to deadlocks in case a threaded handler
> shared a lock with code running in hard interrupt context (e.g. timer
> callbacks) and did not explicitly disable interrupts.
>
> Since commit 81e2073c175b ("genirq: Disable interrupts for force
> threaded handlers") interrupt handlers always run with interrupts
> disabled on non-RT so that drivers no longer need to do handle forced
> threading ("threadirqs").
What happens on RT systems? Are they smart enough to avoid the whole
problem by enabling interrupts during _all_ callbacks?
Alan Stern
Powered by blists - more mailing lists