[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <33380a70-c594-cefe-14b8-c1fbf2dd90af@ieee.org>
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2021 12:41:37 -0500
From: Alex Elder <elder@...e.org>
To: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Alex Elder <elder@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Mar 22 (net/ipa)
On 3/22/21 12:16 PM, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 3/22/21 12:52 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Warning: Some of the branches in linux-next may still based on v5.12-rc1,
>> so please be careful if you are trying to bisect a bug.
>>
>> News: if your -next included tree is based on Linus' tree tag
>> v5.12-rc1{,-dontuse} (or somewhere between v5.11 and that tag), please
>> consider rebasing it onto v5.12-rc2. Also, please check any branches
>> merged into your branch.
>>
>> Changes since 20210319:
>>
>
>
> on i386:
>
> ld: drivers/net/ipa/gsi.o: in function `gsi_ring_alloc':
> gsi.c:(.text+0x926): undefined reference to `__umoddi3'
This code assumes a 32-bit kernel implies a 32-bit dma_addr_t.
But it seems that's not the case for i386...
Let me try to reproduce this. The fix should be easy.
Sorry about that.
-Alex
Powered by blists - more mailing lists