lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 22 Mar 2021 19:19:45 +0100
From:   Michael Walle <michael@...le.cc>
To:     linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>,
        Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
        Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>,
        Rafał Miłecki <rafal@...ecki.pl>,
        Michael Walle <michael@...le.cc>
Subject: [RFC PATCH 0/4] mtd: core: OTP nvmem provider support

The goal is to fetch a (base) MAC address from the OTP region of a SPI NOR
flash.

This is the first part, where I try to add the nvmem provider support to
the MTD core.

I'm not sure about the device tree bindings. Consider the following two
variants:

(1)
    flash@0 {
        ..

        otp {
            compatible = "mtd-user-otp";
            #address-cells = <1>;
            #size-cells = <1>;

            serial-number@0 {
                reg = <0x0 0x8>;
            };
        };
    };

(2)
    flash@0 {
        ..

        otp {
            compatible = "mtd-user-otp";
            #address-cells = <1>;
            #size-cells = <1>;

			some-useful-name {
                compatible = "nvmem-cells";

                serial-number@0 {
                    reg = <0x0 0x8>;
                };
			};
        };
    };

Both bindings use a subnode "opt[-N]". We cannot have the nvmem cells as
children to the flash node because of the legacy partition binding.

(1) seems to be the form which is used almost everywhere in the kernel.
That is, the nvmem cells are just children of the parent node.

(2) seem to be more natural, because there might also be other properties
inside the otp subnode and might be more future-proof.

At the moment this patch implements (1).

Michael Walle (4):
  nvmem: core: allow specifying of_node
  dt-bindings: mtd: add YAML schema for the generic MTD bindings
  dt-bindings: mtd: add OTP bindings
  mtd: core: add OTP nvmem provider support

 .../devicetree/bindings/mtd/common.txt        |  16 +-
 .../devicetree/bindings/mtd/mtd.yaml          | 110 +++++++++++++
 drivers/mtd/mtdcore.c                         | 149 ++++++++++++++++++
 drivers/nvmem/core.c                          |   4 +-
 include/linux/mtd/mtd.h                       |   2 +
 include/linux/nvmem-provider.h                |   2 +
 6 files changed, 267 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/mtd.yaml

-- 
2.20.1

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ