linux-kernel - Re: Linux 5.10.25

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YFjjtSi+H33zXQOn@pick.fieldses.org>
Date:   Mon, 22 Mar 2021 14:36:37 -0400
From:   "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...hat.com>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Linux 5.10.25

On Sun, Mar 21, 2021 at 11:07:08PM +0000, Jamie Heilman wrote:
> Jamie Heilman wrote:
> > Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > On Sat, Mar 20, 2021 at 09:31:55PM +0000, Jamie Heilman wrote:
> > > > [ugh, resent with the lkml headers unbroken, sorry about the dupe]
> > > > 
> > > > Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > > > J. Bruce Fields (2):
> > > > >       Revert "nfsd4: remove check_conflicting_opens warning"
> > > > >       Revert "nfsd4: a client's own opens needn't prevent delegations"
> > > > 
> > > > Hrm, just got this when I udpated my nfs server (32bit Via EPIA system)
> > > > from 5.10.20 to 5.10.25:
> > > > 
> > > > [   49.225914] NFSD: Using UMH upcall client tracking operations.
> > > > [   49.231919] NFSD: starting 90-second grace period (net f0000036)
> > > > [   50.036973] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> > > > [   50.041771] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 2284 at fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c:4968 nfsd4_process_open2+0xf9c/0x1170 [nfsd]
> > > > [   50.051434] Modules linked in: md5 cpufreq_conservative cpufreq_userspace cpufreq_powersave cpufreq_ondemand autofs4 quota_v2 quota_tree nfsd auth_rpcgss nfs lockd grace nfs_ssc fscache sunrpc xt_mark cls_fw sch_htb iptable_nat xt_nat nf_nat ipt_REJECT nf_reject_ipv4 xt_tcpudp xt_multiport iptable_mangle xt_state xt_conntrack nf_conntrack nf_defrag_ipv4 nf_log_ipv4 nf_log_common xt_LOG xt_limit iptable_filter ip_tables x_tables nhpoly1305 chacha_generic libchacha adiantum libpoly1305 dm_crypt dm_mod snd_hda_codec_via snd_hda_codec_generic snd_hda_intel snd_intel_dspcfg snd_hda_codec snd_hwdep snd_hda_core snd_pcm snd_timer snd via_rhine psmouse soundcore mii via_agp sg via_velocity evdev agpgart
> > > > [   50.113386] CPU: 0 PID: 2284 Comm: nfsd Tainted: G                T 5.10.25 #1
> > > > [   50.120669] Hardware name: To Be Filled By O.E.M. To Be Filled By O.E.M./To be filled by O.E.M., BIOS 080014  06/01/2009
> > > > [   50.131652] EIP: nfsd4_process_open2+0xf9c/0x1170 [nfsd]
> > > > [   50.137036] Code: 04 88 45 a4 88 07 8b 45 a0 8d 78 49 8b 45 84 8d 70 01 e9 2b f8 ff ff c7 45 9c 00 00 00 00 31 ff bb 00 00 27 67 e9 04 f6 ff ff <0f> 0b e9 a0 f5 ff ff 0f b6 d4 0f a3 15 94 3f 23 f8 0f 83 b1 fd ff
> > > > [   50.155866] EAX: 00000000 EBX: 82da25b0 ECX: 830c0920 EDX: 00000000
> > > > [   50.162187] ESI: 82da25b0 EDI: 82da55a0 EBP: 8310be68 ESP: 8310bddc
> > > > [   50.168507] DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 0000 GS: 00e0 SS: 0068 EFLAGS: 00010246
> > > > [   50.175338] CR0: 80050033 CR2: 00551e50 CR3: 03222000 CR4: 000006b0
> > > > [   50.181654] Call Trace:
> > > > [   50.184165]  ? inode_permission+0x17/0xc0
> > > > [   50.188289]  nfsd4_open+0x429/0x910 [nfsd]
> > > > [   50.192483]  ? nfsd4_encode_operation+0x185/0x1e0 [nfsd]
> > > > [   50.197900]  ? nfsd4_rename+0x1a0/0x1a0 [nfsd]
> > > > [   50.202439]  nfsd4_proc_compound+0x457/0x6c0 [nfsd]
> > > > [   50.207419]  nfsd_dispatch+0xdc/0x1a0 [nfsd]
> > > > [   50.211816]  svc_process_common+0x38a/0x650 [sunrpc]
> > > > [   50.216880]  ? svc_xprt_do_enqueue+0xd7/0xe0 [sunrpc]
> > > > [   50.222017]  ? svc_xprt_received+0x5d/0xf0 [sunrpc]
> > > > [   50.227000]  ? nfsd_svc+0x300/0x300 [nfsd]
> > > > [   50.231190]  svc_process+0xa9/0xf0 [sunrpc]
> > > > [   50.235468]  nfsd+0xcd/0x120 [nfsd]
> > > > [   50.239025]  kthread+0xe1/0x100
> > > > [   50.242259]  ? nfsd_destroy+0x50/0x50 [nfsd]
> > > > [   50.246588]  ? kthread_create_on_node+0x30/0x30
> > > > [   50.251165]  ret_from_fork+0x1c/0x28
> > > > [   50.254789] ---[ end trace 171bde4774bc9795 ]---
> > > > 
> > > > Can't readily reproduce it though, so likely a race condition or
> > > > something that requires more state buildup than I have after a few
> > > > minutes of uptime.  Kernel config at
> > > > http://audible.transient.net/~jamie/k/nfsd.config-5.10.25 in case you
> > > > think this worth more investigation.
> > > 
> > > Do you also have this issue in Linus's tree and the latest 5.11.y
> > > release?
> > 
> > Haven't tried it, but like I said, I couldn't even reproduce it again
> > with 5.10.25, or booting between 5.10.20 to 5.10.25 again ... I'll
> > give the others a shot and see if I can repro it there.
> 
> Yeah, can't repro it with 5.11.8 or 5.12.0-rc3-00281-g1d4345eb51a1
> either, seems to have been a spurious thing.

I've seen at least one report previously, so it's not a regression.

I'm not sure what's going on there.  I think it might actually be
possible if a CLOSE arrives from the client at exactly the wrong moment.
In which case, all that happens here is we decline to give out a
delegation.  Probably the warning should just be removed.

--b.