[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <161644749627.398.4415880937638801207.tip-bot2@tip-bot2>
Date:   Mon, 22 Mar 2021 21:11:36 -0000
From:   "tip-bot2 for Arnd Bergmann" <tip-bot2@...utronix.de>
To:     linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [tip: perf/urgent] lockdep: Address clang -Wformat warning printing for %hd
The following commit has been merged into the perf/urgent branch of tip:
Commit-ID:     6d48b7912cc72275dc7c59ff961c8bac7ef66a92
Gitweb:        https://git.kernel.org/tip/6d48b7912cc72275dc7c59ff961c8bac7ef66a92
Author:        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
AuthorDate:    Mon, 22 Mar 2021 12:55:25 +01:00
Committer:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
CommitterDate: Mon, 22 Mar 2021 22:07:09 +01:00
lockdep: Address clang -Wformat warning printing for %hd
Clang doesn't like format strings that truncate a 32-bit
value to something shorter:
  kernel/locking/lockdep.c:709:4: error: format specifies type 'short' but the argument has type 'int' [-Werror,-Wformat]
In this case, the warning is a slightly questionable, as it could realize
that both class->wait_type_outer and class->wait_type_inner are in fact
8-bit struct members, even though the result of the ?: operator becomes an
'int'.
However, there is really no point in printing the number as a 16-bit
'short' rather than either an 8-bit or 32-bit number, so just change
it to a normal %d.
Fixes: de8f5e4f2dc1 ("lockdep: Introduce wait-type checks")
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210322115531.3987555-1-arnd@kernel.org
---
 kernel/locking/lockdep.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
index c30eb88..f160f1c 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
@@ -705,7 +705,7 @@ static void print_lock_name(struct lock_class *class)
 
 	printk(KERN_CONT " (");
 	__print_lock_name(class);
-	printk(KERN_CONT "){%s}-{%hd:%hd}", usage,
+	printk(KERN_CONT "){%s}-{%d:%d}", usage,
 			class->wait_type_outer ?: class->wait_type_inner,
 			class->wait_type_inner);
 }
Powered by blists - more mailing lists