| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20210322230258.GA1983587@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2021 00:02:58 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] rcu: Fix various typos in comments
Hi Paul,
Was working on automation to make it a bit more straightforward to fix
typos within comments (which we tend to reintroduce during
development), and here are the ones it found in the RCU code.
Thanks,
Ingo
=========>
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2021 23:57:26 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] rcu: Fix various typos in comments
Fix ~12 single-word typos in RCU code comments.
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
---
kernel/rcu/srcutree.c | 4 ++--
kernel/rcu/sync.c | 2 +-
kernel/rcu/tasks.h | 8 ++++----
kernel/rcu/tree.c | 4 ++--
kernel/rcu/tree.h | 2 +-
kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h | 2 +-
tools/testing/selftests/rcutorture/formal/srcu-cbmc/src/locks.h | 2 +-
7 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c b/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c
index e26547b34ad3..036ff5499ad5 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c
@@ -777,9 +777,9 @@ static bool srcu_might_be_idle(struct srcu_struct *ssp)
spin_unlock_irqrestore_rcu_node(sdp, flags);
/*
- * No local callbacks, so probabalistically probe global state.
+ * No local callbacks, so probabilistically probe global state.
* Exact information would require acquiring locks, which would
- * kill scalability, hence the probabalistic nature of the probe.
+ * kill scalability, hence the probabilistic nature of the probe.
*/
/* First, see if enough time has passed since the last GP. */
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/sync.c b/kernel/rcu/sync.c
index d4558ab7a07d..3eeb871cf0de 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/sync.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/sync.c
@@ -94,7 +94,7 @@ static void rcu_sync_func(struct rcu_head *rhp)
rcu_sync_call(rsp);
} else {
/*
- * We're at least a GP after the last rcu_sync_exit(); eveybody
+ * We're at least a GP after the last rcu_sync_exit(); everybody
* will now have observed the write side critical section.
* Let 'em rip!.
*/
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tasks.h b/kernel/rcu/tasks.h
index af7c19439f4e..ac3c362e08a3 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tasks.h
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tasks.h
@@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ typedef void (*postgp_func_t)(struct rcu_tasks *rtp);
* Definition for a Tasks-RCU-like mechanism.
* @cbs_head: Head of callback list.
* @cbs_tail: Tail pointer for callback list.
- * @cbs_wq: Wait queue allowning new callback to get kthread's attention.
+ * @cbs_wq: Wait queue allowing new callback to get kthread's attention.
* @cbs_lock: Lock protecting callback list.
* @kthread_ptr: This flavor's grace-period/callback-invocation kthread.
* @gp_func: This flavor's grace-period-wait function.
@@ -504,7 +504,7 @@ DEFINE_RCU_TASKS(rcu_tasks, rcu_tasks_wait_gp, call_rcu_tasks, "RCU Tasks");
* or transition to usermode execution. As such, there are no read-side
* primitives analogous to rcu_read_lock() and rcu_read_unlock() because
* this primitive is intended to determine that all tasks have passed
- * through a safe state, not so much for data-strcuture synchronization.
+ * through a safe state, not so much for data-structure synchronization.
*
* See the description of call_rcu() for more detailed information on
* memory ordering guarantees.
@@ -637,7 +637,7 @@ DEFINE_RCU_TASKS(rcu_tasks_rude, rcu_tasks_rude_wait_gp, call_rcu_tasks_rude,
* there are no read-side primitives analogous to rcu_read_lock() and
* rcu_read_unlock() because this primitive is intended to determine
* that all tasks have passed through a safe state, not so much for
- * data-strcuture synchronization.
+ * data-structure synchronization.
*
* See the description of call_rcu() for more detailed information on
* memory ordering guarantees.
@@ -1127,7 +1127,7 @@ static void exit_tasks_rcu_finish_trace(struct task_struct *t)
* there are no read-side primitives analogous to rcu_read_lock() and
* rcu_read_unlock() because this primitive is intended to determine
* that all tasks have passed through a safe state, not so much for
- * data-strcuture synchronization.
+ * data-structure synchronization.
*
* See the description of call_rcu() for more detailed information on
* memory ordering guarantees.
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
index da6f5213fb74..ab5bd5b391e6 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
@@ -2490,7 +2490,7 @@ int rcutree_dead_cpu(unsigned int cpu)
/*
* Invoke any RCU callbacks that have made it to the end of their grace
- * period. Thottle as specified by rdp->blimit.
+ * period. Throttle as specified by rdp->blimit.
*/
static void rcu_do_batch(struct rcu_data *rdp)
{
@@ -4013,7 +4013,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rcu_barrier);
/*
* Propagate ->qsinitmask bits up the rcu_node tree to account for the
* first CPU in a given leaf rcu_node structure coming online. The caller
- * must hold the corresponding leaf rcu_node ->lock with interrrupts
+ * must hold the corresponding leaf rcu_node ->lock with interrupts
* disabled.
*/
static void rcu_init_new_rnp(struct rcu_node *rnp_leaf)
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.h b/kernel/rcu/tree.h
index 71821d59d95c..abff7abd59ee 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.h
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.h
@@ -153,7 +153,7 @@ struct rcu_data {
unsigned long gp_seq; /* Track rsp->gp_seq counter. */
unsigned long gp_seq_needed; /* Track furthest future GP request. */
union rcu_noqs cpu_no_qs; /* No QSes yet for this CPU. */
- bool core_needs_qs; /* Core waits for quiesc state. */
+ bool core_needs_qs; /* Core waits for quiescent state. */
bool beenonline; /* CPU online at least once. */
bool gpwrap; /* Possible ->gp_seq wrap. */
bool exp_deferred_qs; /* This CPU awaiting a deferred QS? */
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
index 2d603771c7dc..2a28f05cf467 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
@@ -2772,7 +2772,7 @@ static void show_rcu_nocb_state(struct rcu_data *rdp)
wastimer = timer_pending(&rdp->nocb_bypass_timer);
wassleep = swait_active(&rdp->nocb_gp_wq);
if (!rdp->nocb_gp_sleep && !waslocked && !wastimer && !wassleep)
- return; /* Nothing untowards. */
+ return; /* Nothing untoward. */
pr_info(" nocb GP activity on CB-only CPU!!! %c%c%c%c %c\n",
"lL"[waslocked],
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/rcutorture/formal/srcu-cbmc/src/locks.h b/tools/testing/selftests/rcutorture/formal/srcu-cbmc/src/locks.h
index cf6938d679d7..1e24827f96f1 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/rcutorture/formal/srcu-cbmc/src/locks.h
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/rcutorture/formal/srcu-cbmc/src/locks.h
@@ -174,7 +174,7 @@ static inline bool spin_trylock(spinlock_t *lock)
}
struct completion {
- /* Hopefuly this won't overflow. */
+ /* Hopefully this won't overflow. */
unsigned int count;
};
Powered by blists - more mailing lists