[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20210322060635.821531-3-like.xu@linux.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2021 14:06:32 +0800
From: Like Xu <like.xu@...ux.intel.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Like Xu <like.xu@...ux.intel.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 RESEND 2/5] perf/x86/lbr: Simplify the exposure check for the LBR_INFO registers
If the platform supports LBR_INFO register, the x86_pmu.lbr_info will
be assigned in intel_pmu_?_lbr_init_?() and it's safe to expose LBR_INFO
in the x86_perf_get_lbr() directly, instead of relying on lbr_format check.
Also Architectural LBR has IA32_LBR_x_INFO instead of LBR_FORMAT_INFO_x
to hold metadata for the operation, including mispredict, TSX, and
elapsed cycle time information.
Signed-off-by: Like Xu <like.xu@...ux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
---
arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c | 4 +---
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c
index 21890dacfcfe..355ea70f1879 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c
@@ -1832,12 +1832,10 @@ void __init intel_pmu_arch_lbr_init(void)
*/
int x86_perf_get_lbr(struct x86_pmu_lbr *lbr)
{
- int lbr_fmt = x86_pmu.intel_cap.lbr_format;
-
lbr->nr = x86_pmu.lbr_nr;
lbr->from = x86_pmu.lbr_from;
lbr->to = x86_pmu.lbr_to;
- lbr->info = (lbr_fmt == LBR_FORMAT_INFO) ? x86_pmu.lbr_info : 0;
+ lbr->info = x86_pmu.lbr_info;
return 0;
}
--
2.29.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists