linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/3] powerpc/mm/hash: Avoid resizing-down HPT on first memory hotplug

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YFg+Edy6dfmZx3lr@yekko.fritz.box>
Date:   Mon, 22 Mar 2021 17:49:53 +1100
From:   David Gibson <david@...son.dropbear.id.au>
To:     Leonardo Bras <leobras.c@...il.com>
Cc:     Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
        Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
        Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Sandipan Das <sandipan@...ux.ibm.com>,
        "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com>,
        Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>,
        Bharata B Rao <bharata@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
        Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
        Nathan Lynch <nathanl@...ux.ibm.com>,
        David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
        Laurent Dufour <ldufour@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Scott Cheloha <cheloha@...ux.ibm.com>,
        linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] powerpc/mm/hash: Avoid resizing-down HPT on first
 memory hotplug

On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 04:29:39AM -0300, Leonardo Bras wrote:
> Because hypervisors may need to create HPTs without knowing the guest
> page size, the smallest used page-size (4k) may be chosen, resulting in
> a HPT that is possibly bigger than needed.
> 
> On a guest with bigger page-sizes, the amount of entries for HTP may be
> too high, causing the guest to ask for a HPT resize-down on the first
> hotplug.
> 
> This becomes a problem when HPT resize-down fails, and causes the
> HPT resize to be performed on every LMB added, until HPT size is
> compatible to guest memory size, causing a major slowdown.
> 
> So, avoiding HPT resizing-down on hot-add significantly improves memory
> hotplug times.
> 
> As an example, hotplugging 256GB on a 129GB guest took 710s without this
> patch, and 21s after applied.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Leonardo Bras <leobras.c@...il.com>

I don't love this approach.  Adding the extra flag at this level seems
a bit inelegant, and it means we're passing up an easy opportunity to
reduce our resource footprint on the host.

But... maybe we'll have to do it.  I'd like to see if we can get
things to work well enough with just the "batching" to avoid multiple
resize attempts first.

> ---
>  arch/powerpc/mm/book3s64/hash_utils.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++-----------
>  1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/book3s64/hash_utils.c b/arch/powerpc/mm/book3s64/hash_utils.c
> index 73b06adb6eeb..cfb3ec164f56 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/mm/book3s64/hash_utils.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/book3s64/hash_utils.c
> @@ -794,7 +794,7 @@ static unsigned long __init htab_get_table_size(void)
>  }
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTPLUG
> -static int resize_hpt_for_hotplug(unsigned long new_mem_size)
> +static int resize_hpt_for_hotplug(unsigned long new_mem_size, bool shrinking)
>  {
>  	unsigned target_hpt_shift;
>  
> @@ -803,19 +803,25 @@ static int resize_hpt_for_hotplug(unsigned long new_mem_size)
>  
>  	target_hpt_shift = htab_shift_for_mem_size(new_mem_size);
>  
> -	/*
> -	 * To avoid lots of HPT resizes if memory size is fluctuating
> -	 * across a boundary, we deliberately have some hysterisis
> -	 * here: we immediately increase the HPT size if the target
> -	 * shift exceeds the current shift, but we won't attempt to
> -	 * reduce unless the target shift is at least 2 below the
> -	 * current shift
> -	 */
> -	if (target_hpt_shift > ppc64_pft_size ||
> -	    target_hpt_shift < ppc64_pft_size - 1)
> -		return mmu_hash_ops.resize_hpt(target_hpt_shift);
> +	if (shrinking) {
>  
> -	return 0;
> +		/*
> +		 * To avoid lots of HPT resizes if memory size is fluctuating
> +		 * across a boundary, we deliberately have some hysterisis
> +		 * here: we immediately increase the HPT size if the target
> +		 * shift exceeds the current shift, but we won't attempt to
> +		 * reduce unless the target shift is at least 2 below the
> +		 * current shift
> +		 */
> +
> +		if (target_hpt_shift >= ppc64_pft_size - 1)
> +			return 0;
> +
> +	} else if (target_hpt_shift <= ppc64_pft_size) {
> +		return 0;
> +	}
> +
> +	return mmu_hash_ops.resize_hpt(target_hpt_shift);
>  }
>  
>  int hash__create_section_mapping(unsigned long start, unsigned long end,
> @@ -828,7 +834,7 @@ int hash__create_section_mapping(unsigned long start, unsigned long end,
>  		return -1;
>  	}
>  
> -	resize_hpt_for_hotplug(memblock_phys_mem_size());
> +	resize_hpt_for_hotplug(memblock_phys_mem_size(), false);
>  
>  	rc = htab_bolt_mapping(start, end, __pa(start),
>  			       pgprot_val(prot), mmu_linear_psize,
> @@ -847,7 +853,7 @@ int hash__remove_section_mapping(unsigned long start, unsigned long end)
>  	int rc = htab_remove_mapping(start, end, mmu_linear_psize,
>  				     mmu_kernel_ssize);
>  
> -	if (resize_hpt_for_hotplug(memblock_phys_mem_size()) == -ENOSPC)
> +	if (resize_hpt_for_hotplug(memblock_phys_mem_size(), true) == -ENOSPC)
>  		pr_warn("Hash collision while resizing HPT\n");
>  
>  	return rc;

-- 
David Gibson			| I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au	| minimalist, thank you.  NOT _the_ _other_
				| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)