[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALW65jYc6DFoUiF55Q3KrhamPf75tFRSAkSA6ONrF3KMf9z+7g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2021 16:04:01 +0800
From: DENG Qingfang <dqfext@...il.com>
To: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Tobias Waldekranz <tobias@...dekranz.com>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Roopa Prabhu <roopa@...dia.com>,
Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@...dia.com>,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>,
Ido Schimmel <idosch@...sch.org>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com, Vadym Kochan <vkochan@...vell.com>,
Taras Chornyi <tchornyi@...vell.com>,
Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com>,
Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>,
Ioana Ciornei <ioana.ciornei@....com>,
Ivan Vecera <ivecera@...hat.com>, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 net-next 14/16] net: dsa: don't set
skb->offload_fwd_mark when not offloading the bridge
On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 6:49 PM Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com> wrote:
> Why would you even want to look at the source net device for forwarding?
> I'd say that if dp->bridge_dev is NULL in the xmit function, you certainly
> want to bypass address learning if you can. Maybe also for link-local traffic.
Also for trapped traffic (snooping, tc-flower trap action) if the CPU
sends them back.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists