[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7f4f7e1c-194b-a903-d474-e3b742556a55@intel.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2021 16:52:08 +0800
From: Rong Chen <rong.a.chen@...el.com>
To: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@...tkopp.net>,
kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Cc: kbuild-all@...ts.01.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [kbuild-all] Re: include/linux/compiler_types.h:315:38: error:
call to '__compiletime_assert_536' declared with attribute error:
BUILD_BUG_ON failed: offsetof(struct can_frame, len) != offsetof(struct
canfd_frame, len) || offsetof(struct can_frame, data) != offsetof(struc...
On 3/21/21 10:19 PM, Oliver Hartkopp wrote:
> Two reminders in two days? ;-)
>
> Did you check my answer here?
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/afffeb73-ba4c-ca2c-75d0-9e7899e5cbe1@hartkopp.net/
>
>
> And did you try the partly revert?
Hi Oliver,
Sorry for the delay, we tried the revert patch and the problem still
exists,
we also found that commit c7b74967 changed the error message which
triggered
the report.
The problem is that offsetof(struct can_frame, data) != offsetof(struct
canfd_frame, data)
the following struct layout shows that the offset has been changed by union:
struct can_frame {
canid_t can_id; /* 0 4 */
union {
__u8 len; /* 4 1 */
__u8 can_dlc; /* 4 1 */
}; /* 4 4 */
__u8 __pad; /* 8 1 */
__u8 __res0; /* 9 1 */
__u8 len8_dlc; /* 10 1 */
/* XXX 5 bytes hole, try to pack */
__u8 data[8]
__attribute__((__aligned__(8))); /* 16 8 */
/* size: 24, cachelines: 1, members: 6 */
/* sum members: 19, holes: 1, sum holes: 5 */
/* forced alignments: 1, forced holes: 1, sum forced holes: 5 */
/* last cacheline: 24 bytes */
} __attribute__((__aligned__(8)));
struct canfd_frame {
canid_t can_id; /* 0 4 */
__u8 len; /* 4 1 */
__u8 flags; /* 5 1 */
__u8 __res0; /* 6 1 */
__u8 __res1; /* 7 1 */
__u8 data[64]
__attribute__((__aligned__(8))); /* 8 64 */
/* size: 72, cachelines: 2, members: 6 */
/* forced alignments: 1 */
/* last cacheline: 8 bytes */
} __attribute__((__aligned__(8)))
and I tried to add "__attribute__((packed))" to the union, the issue is
gone:
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/can.h b/include/uapi/linux/can.h
index f75238ac6dce..9842bb55ffd9 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/can.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/can.h
@@ -113,7 +113,7 @@ struct can_frame {
*/
__u8 len;
__u8 can_dlc; /* deprecated */
- };
+ } __attribute__((packed));
__u8 __pad; /* padding */
__u8 __res0; /* reserved / padding */
__u8 len8_dlc; /* optional DLC for 8 byte payload length (9 ..
15) */
Best Regards,
Rong Chen
>
> Maybe there's a mismatch in include files - or BUILD_BUG_ON()
> generally does not work with unions on ARM as assumed here:
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/6e57d5d2-9b88-aee6-fb7a-82e24144d179@hartkopp.net/
>
>
> In both cases I can not really fix the issue.
> When the partly revert (suggested above) works, this would be a hack too.
>
> Best,
> Oliver
>
> On 20.03.21 21:43, kernel test robot wrote:
>> Hi Oliver,
>>
>> FYI, the error/warning still remains.
>>
>> tree:
>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git
>> master
>> head: 812da4d39463a060738008a46cfc9f775e4bfcf6
>> commit: c7b74967799b1af52b3045d69d4c26836b2d41de can: replace can_dlc
>> as variable/element for payload length
>> date: 4 months ago
>> config: arm-randconfig-r016-20210321 (attached as .config)
>> compiler: arm-linux-gnueabi-gcc (GCC) 9.3.0
>> reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
>> wget
>> https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross
>> -O ~/bin/make.cross
>> chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
>> #
>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=c7b74967799b1af52b3045d69d4c26836b2d41de
>> git remote add linus
>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git
>> git fetch --no-tags linus master
>> git checkout c7b74967799b1af52b3045d69d4c26836b2d41de
>> # save the attached .config to linux build tree
>> COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=gcc-9.3.0
>> make.cross ARCH=arm
>>
>> If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
>> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
>>
>> All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
>>
>> In file included from <command-line>:
>> net/can/af_can.c: In function 'can_init':
>>>> include/linux/compiler_types.h:315:38: error: call to
>>>> '__compiletime_assert_536' declared with attribute error:
>>>> BUILD_BUG_ON failed: offsetof(struct can_frame, len) !=
>>>> offsetof(struct canfd_frame, len) || offsetof(struct can_frame,
>>>> data) != offsetof(struct canfd_frame, data)
>> 315 | _compiletime_assert(condition, msg,
>> __compiletime_assert_, __COUNTER__)
>> | ^
>> include/linux/compiler_types.h:296:4: note: in definition of
>> macro '__compiletime_assert'
>> 296 | prefix ## suffix(); \
>> | ^~~~~~
>> include/linux/compiler_types.h:315:2: note: in expansion of macro
>> '_compiletime_assert'
>> 315 | _compiletime_assert(condition, msg,
>> __compiletime_assert_, __COUNTER__)
>> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> include/linux/build_bug.h:39:37: note: in expansion of macro
>> 'compiletime_assert'
>> 39 | #define BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG(cond, msg)
>> compiletime_assert(!(cond), msg)
>> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> include/linux/build_bug.h:50:2: note: in expansion of macro
>> 'BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG'
>> 50 | BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG(condition, "BUILD_BUG_ON failed: "
>> #condition)
>> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> net/can/af_can.c:891:2: note: in expansion of macro 'BUILD_BUG_ON'
>> 891 | BUILD_BUG_ON(offsetof(struct can_frame, len) !=
>> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~
>>
>>
>> vim +/__compiletime_assert_536 +315 include/linux/compiler_types.h
>>
>> eb5c2d4b45e3d2 Will Deacon 2020-07-21 301
>> eb5c2d4b45e3d2 Will Deacon 2020-07-21 302 #define
>> _compiletime_assert(condition, msg, prefix, suffix) \
>> eb5c2d4b45e3d2 Will Deacon 2020-07-21 303
>> __compiletime_assert(condition, msg, prefix, suffix)
>> eb5c2d4b45e3d2 Will Deacon 2020-07-21 304
>> eb5c2d4b45e3d2 Will Deacon 2020-07-21 305 /**
>> eb5c2d4b45e3d2 Will Deacon 2020-07-21 306 * compiletime_assert -
>> break build and emit msg if condition is false
>> eb5c2d4b45e3d2 Will Deacon 2020-07-21 307 * @condition: a
>> compile-time constant condition to check
>> eb5c2d4b45e3d2 Will Deacon 2020-07-21 308 * @msg: a message
>> to emit if condition is false
>> eb5c2d4b45e3d2 Will Deacon 2020-07-21 309 *
>> eb5c2d4b45e3d2 Will Deacon 2020-07-21 310 * In tradition of POSIX
>> assert, this macro will break the build if the
>> eb5c2d4b45e3d2 Will Deacon 2020-07-21 311 * supplied condition is
>> *false*, emitting the supplied error message if the
>> eb5c2d4b45e3d2 Will Deacon 2020-07-21 312 * compiler has support
>> to do so.
>> eb5c2d4b45e3d2 Will Deacon 2020-07-21 313 */
>> eb5c2d4b45e3d2 Will Deacon 2020-07-21 314 #define
>> compiletime_assert(condition, msg) \
>> eb5c2d4b45e3d2 Will Deacon 2020-07-21 @315
>> _compiletime_assert(condition, msg, __compiletime_assert_, __COUNTER__)
>> eb5c2d4b45e3d2 Will Deacon 2020-07-21 316
>>
>> :::::: The code at line 315 was first introduced by commit
>> :::::: eb5c2d4b45e3d2d5d052ea6b8f1463976b1020d5 compiler.h: Move
>> compiletime_assert() macros into compiler_types.h
>>
>> :::::: TO: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
>> :::::: CC: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
>>
>> ---
>> 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation
>> https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all@lists.01.org
>>
> _______________________________________________
> kbuild-all mailing list -- kbuild-all@...ts.01.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to kbuild-all-leave@...ts.01.org
Powered by blists - more mailing lists