linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3] gpio: pl061: Support implementations without GPIOINTR line

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CACRpkdbRT1b=w6UPjK98U7Jn75Ou+7Y7YjUqa06mwp9E1TwQnQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 22 Mar 2021 10:17:28 +0100
From:   Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To:     Alexander Sverdlin <alexander.sverdlin@...ia.com>
Cc:     Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
        "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
        Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] gpio: pl061: Support implementations without GPIOINTR line

On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 9:50 AM Alexander Sverdlin
<alexander.sverdlin@...ia.com> wrote:
> On 20/03/2021 12:10, Linus Walleij wrote:
> >>> I'm wondering if the GPIO library support for IRQ hierarchy is what
> >>> you are looking for.
> > It is indeed what should be used.
>
> and what has been used in my patch?

Yes you're right.

> > I think it can be done with quite little code.
>
> Guys, have you actually looked onto my patch before these reviews?

I don't know why I missed it, I guess my second mail is more
to the point.

Yours,
Linus Walleij