[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1616381339.fjexi9aqhl.astroid@bobo.none>
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2021 12:52:40 +1000
From: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>
To: Balbir Singh <bsingharora@...il.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 01/25] mm: Introduce struct folio
Excerpts from Matthew Wilcox's message of March 19, 2021 11:25 am:
> On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 10:56:45AM +1100, Balbir Singh wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 05, 2021 at 04:18:37AM +0000, Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) wrote:
>> > A struct folio refers to an entire (possibly compound) page. A function
>> > which takes a struct folio argument declares that it will operate on the
>> > entire compound page, not just PAGE_SIZE bytes. In return, the caller
>> > guarantees that the pointer it is passing does not point to a tail page.
>> >
>>
>> Is this a part of a larger use case or general cleanup/refactor where
>> the split between page and folio simplify programming?
>
> The goal here is to manage memory in larger chunks. Pages are now too
> small for just about every workload. Even compiling the kernel sees a 7%
> performance improvement just by doing readahead using relatively small
> THPs (16k-256k). You can see that work here:
> https://git.infradead.org/users/willy/pagecache.git/shortlog/refs/heads/master
The 7% improvement comes from cache cold kbuild by improving IO
patterns?
Just wondering what kind of readahead is enabled by this that can't
be done with base page size.
Thanks,
Nick
Powered by blists - more mailing lists