linux-kernel - [PATCH 5.11 108/120] ext4: find old entry again if failed to rename whiteout

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20210322121933.267959936@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Mon, 22 Mar 2021 13:28:11 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, "zhangyi (F)" <yi.zhang@...wei.com>,
        Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>
Subject: [PATCH 5.11 108/120] ext4: find old entry again if failed to rename whiteout

From: zhangyi (F) <yi.zhang@...wei.com>

commit b7ff91fd030dc9d72ed91b1aab36e445a003af4f upstream.

If we failed to add new entry on rename whiteout, we cannot reset the
old->de entry directly, because the old->de could have moved from under
us during make indexed dir. So find the old entry again before reset is
needed, otherwise it may corrupt the filesystem as below.

  /dev/sda: Entry '00000001' in ??? (12) has deleted/unused inode 15. CLEARED.
  /dev/sda: Unattached inode 75
  /dev/sda: UNEXPECTED INCONSISTENCY; RUN fsck MANUALLY.

Fixes: 6b4b8e6b4ad ("ext4: fix bug for rename with RENAME_WHITEOUT")
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: zhangyi (F) <yi.zhang@...wei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210303131703.330415-1-yi.zhang@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 fs/ext4/namei.c |   29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/fs/ext4/namei.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/namei.c
@@ -3601,6 +3601,31 @@ static int ext4_setent(handle_t *handle,
 	return retval;
 }
 
+static void ext4_resetent(handle_t *handle, struct ext4_renament *ent,
+			  unsigned ino, unsigned file_type)
+{
+	struct ext4_renament old = *ent;
+	int retval = 0;
+
+	/*
+	 * old->de could have moved from under us during make indexed dir,
+	 * so the old->de may no longer valid and need to find it again
+	 * before reset old inode info.
+	 */
+	old.bh = ext4_find_entry(old.dir, &old.dentry->d_name, &old.de, NULL);
+	if (IS_ERR(old.bh))
+		retval = PTR_ERR(old.bh);
+	if (!old.bh)
+		retval = -ENOENT;
+	if (retval) {
+		ext4_std_error(old.dir->i_sb, retval);
+		return;
+	}
+
+	ext4_setent(handle, &old, ino, file_type);
+	brelse(old.bh);
+}
+
 static int ext4_find_delete_entry(handle_t *handle, struct inode *dir,
 				  const struct qstr *d_name)
 {
@@ -3923,8 +3948,8 @@ static int ext4_rename(struct inode *old
 end_rename:
 	if (whiteout) {
 		if (retval) {
-			ext4_setent(handle, &old,
-				old.inode->i_ino, old_file_type);
+			ext4_resetent(handle, &old,
+				      old.inode->i_ino, old_file_type);
 			drop_nlink(whiteout);
 		}
 		unlock_new_inode(whiteout);