[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d73b1039-c05d-c153-644e-ed260a57e4f1@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2021 21:39:21 -0400
From: Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
To: Shaokun Zhang <zhangshaokun@...ilicon.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] locking/mutex: Remove repeated declaration
On 3/22/21 9:09 PM, Shaokun Zhang wrote:
> Commit 0cd39f4600ed ("locking/seqlock, headers: Untangle the spaghetti monster")
> introduces 'struct ww_acquire_ctx' again, remove the repeated declaration.
>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
> Cc: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
> Cc: Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
> Cc: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>
> Signed-off-by: Shaokun Zhang <zhangshaokun@...ilicon.com>
> ---
> include/linux/mutex.h | 2 --
> 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/mutex.h b/include/linux/mutex.h
> index 0cd631a19727..d80c0e22c822 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mutex.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mutex.h
> @@ -20,8 +20,6 @@
> #include <linux/osq_lock.h>
> #include <linux/debug_locks.h>
>
> -struct ww_acquire_ctx;
> -
> /*
> * Simple, straightforward mutexes with strict semantics:
> *
Yes, it is duplicated.
Acked-by: Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists