linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH mfd v1] mfd: Add Renesas Synchronization Management Unit (SMU) support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 23 Mar 2021 15:01:17 +0000
From:   Min Li <min.li.xe@...esas.com>
To:     Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
CC:     "sameo@...ux.intel.com" <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
        "grant.likely@...aro.org" <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
        "robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH mfd v1] mfd: Add Renesas Synchronization Management Unit
 (SMU) support

> >
> > I am wondering if this is the correct tree to submit the patch for MFD?
> >
> > So to sum it up, the latest patch is my first version to this tree.
> 
> Either MFD or -next is fine for MFD-only patches.
> 
> Has the code changed at all in any of the patches?
> 
> If so, please provide a change-log, so we can keep up.
> 
> --

I kind of want to discard the previous patch and start a brand new review based on next, can I do that?