lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210323165949.GA2457820@infradead.org>
Date:   Tue, 23 Mar 2021 16:59:49 +0000
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To:     Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
Cc:     "Thomas Hellstr??m (Intel)" <thomas_os@...pmail.org>,
        dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        Christian Koenig <christian.koenig@....com>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] mm,drm/ttm: Block fast GUP to TTM huge pages

On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 01:37:15PM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> Isn't the devmap PTE flag arch optional? Does this fall back to not
> using huge pages on arches that don't support it?
> 
> Also, I feel like this code to install "pte_special" huge pages does
> not belong in the drm subsystem..

It doesn't.  Unfortunately the drm code has a lot of such warts where
it pokes way to deep into VM internals. 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ