linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] mfd: ntxec: Support for EC in Tolino Shine 2 HD

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 23 Mar 2021 17:48:41 +0000
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Cc:     Andreas Kemnade <andreas@...nade.info>, j.neuschaefer@....net,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mfd: ntxec: Support for EC in Tolino Shine 2 HD

On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 05:20:02PM +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Mar 2021, Mark Brown wrote:
> 
> > On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 02:59:25PM +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> > > On Thu, 11 Mar 2021, Mark Brown wrote:

> > > > If there were more users it'd be better to have this in the core so that
> > > > problems we can detect like cache stuff if that's used but if it's just
> > > > one broken device it's probably not worth it, this seems like something
> > > > you'd have to try to end up with and which is going to cause timeout
> > > > problems with a lot of I2C controllers which would tank performance
> > > > enough that people would notice.

> > > So Yoda, is this to go into the core, or stay where it is?

> > Well, nobody's sent me any patches.

> Code is still in the driver in v4.

> My question is; should these functions really live in the SS?

Perhaps we could avoid using that particular abbreviation.

Like I say it depends on how common this is - are we seeing other
devices with the same problem?

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)