[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YFo9s/Qyrfk4FG6z@kroah.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2021 20:12:51 +0100
From: 'Greg KH' <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Don Bollinger <don@...bollingers.org>
Cc: arndb@...db.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
brandon_chuang@...e-core.com, wally_wang@...ton.com,
aken_liu@...e-core.com, gulv@...rosoft.com, jolevequ@...rosoft.com,
xinxliu@...rosoft.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] eeprom/optoe: driver to read/write SFP/QSFP/CMIS
EEPROMS
On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 12:08:32PM -0700, Don Bollinger wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 12:00AM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 11:43:55AM -0700, Don Bollinger wrote:
> > > On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 7:12AM-0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 11:38:21AM -0800, Don Bollinger wrote:
> > > > > optoe is an i2c based driver that supports read/write access to
> > > > > all the pages (tables) of MSA standard SFP and similar devices
> > > > > (conforming to the SFF-8472 spec), MSA standard QSFP and similar
> > > > > devices (conforming to the SFF-8636 spec) and CMIS and similar
> > > > > devices (conforming to the Common Management Interface
> > Specfication).
> > > >
> > >
> > > I promise not to engage in a drawn out email exchange over this, but I
> > > would like to appeal your decision, just once...
>
> Thanks for your response. As promised, I'm done.
>
> Is there a correct protocol for withdrawing a patch, or does it just get
> abandoned? Still trying to be a good citizen.
Patches just get abandonded, nothing special to do here, we have mailing
lists littered with them :)
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists