linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] mfd: ntxec: Support for EC in Tolino Shine 2 HD

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20210323194452.GF5490@sirena.org.uk>
Date:   Tue, 23 Mar 2021 19:44:52 +0000
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Cc:     Andreas Kemnade <andreas@...nade.info>, j.neuschaefer@....net,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mfd: ntxec: Support for EC in Tolino Shine 2 HD

On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 06:52:54PM +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Mar 2021, Mark Brown wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 05:20:02PM +0000, Lee Jones wrote:

> > > My question is; should these functions really live in the SS?

> > Perhaps we could avoid using that particular abbreviation.

> Too soon?

Sadly there's still people who keep it relevant around.

> > Like I say it depends on how common this is - are we seeing other
> > devices with the same problem?

> I'm not witness to any.  If this is your first encounter too then
> maybe just leave it where it is.  At least for the moment.

Sounds reasonable, if more turn up the code can always be pulled into
the core.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)