linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] mm: page_alloc: fix memcg accounting leak in speculative cache lookup

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LSU.2.11.2103231310020.5513@eggly.anvils>
Date:   Tue, 23 Mar 2021 13:10:13 -0700 (PDT)
From:   Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
To:     Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
cc:     Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
        Zhou Guanghui <zhouguanghui1@...wei.com>,
        Zi Yan <ziy@...dia.com>, Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>,
        Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        cgroups@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        kernel-team@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: page_alloc: fix memcg accounting leak in speculative
 cache lookup

On Tue, 23 Mar 2021, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> From f6f062a3ec46f4fb083dcf6792fde9723f18cfc5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
> Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2021 02:17:00 -0400
> Subject: [PATCH] mm: page_alloc: fix allocation imbalances from speculative
>  cache lookup
> 
> When the freeing of a higher-order page block (non-compound) races
> with a speculative page cache lookup, __free_pages() needs to leave
> the first order-0 page in the chunk to the lookup but free the buddy
> pages that the lookup doesn't know about separately.
> 
> There are currently two problems with it:
> 
> 1. It checks PageHead() to see whether we're dealing with a compound
>    page after put_page_testzero(). But the speculative lookup could
>    have freed the page after our put and cleared PageHead, in which
>    case we would double free the tail pages.
> 
>    To fix this, test PageHead before the put and cache the result for
>    afterwards.
> 
> 2. If such a higher-order page is charged to a memcg (e.g. !vmap
>    kernel stack)), only the first page of the block has page->memcg
>    set. That means we'll uncharge only one order-0 page from the
>    entire block, and leak the remainder.
> 
>    To fix this, add a split_page_memcg() before it starts freeing tail
>    pages, to ensure they all have page->memcg set up.
> 
> While at it, also update the comments a bit to clarify what exactly is
> happening to the page during that race.
> 
> Fixes: e320d3012d25 mm/page_alloc.c: fix freeing non-compound pages
> Reported-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
> Reported-by: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
> Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
> Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org> # 5.10+

This is great, thanks Hannes.
Acked-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>

I know that 5.10-stable rejected the two split_page_memcg() patches:
we shall need those in, I'll send GregKH the fixups, but not today.

> ---
>  mm/page_alloc.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
>  1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
> index c53fe4fa10bf..8aab1e87fa3c 100644
> --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
> +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
> @@ -5112,10 +5112,9 @@ static inline void free_the_page(struct page *page, unsigned int order)
>   * the allocation, so it is easy to leak memory.  Freeing more memory
>   * than was allocated will probably emit a warning.
>   *
> - * If the last reference to this page is speculative, it will be released
> - * by put_page() which only frees the first page of a non-compound
> - * allocation.  To prevent the remaining pages from being leaked, we free
> - * the subsequent pages here.  If you want to use the page's reference
> + * This function isn't a put_page(). Don't let the put_page_testzero()
> + * fool you, it's only to deal with speculative cache references. It
> + * WILL free pages directly. If you want to use the page's reference
>   * count to decide when to free the allocation, you should allocate a
>   * compound page, and use put_page() instead of __free_pages().
>   *
> @@ -5124,11 +5123,41 @@ static inline void free_the_page(struct page *page, unsigned int order)
>   */
>  void __free_pages(struct page *page, unsigned int order)
>  {
> -	if (put_page_testzero(page))
> +	bool compound = PageHead(page);
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Drop the base reference from __alloc_pages and free. In
> +	 * case there is an outstanding speculative reference, from
> +	 * e.g. the page cache, it will put and free the page later.
> +	 */
> +	if (likely(put_page_testzero(page))) {
>  		free_the_page(page, order);
> -	else if (!PageHead(page))
> +		return;
> +	}
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Ok, the speculative reference will put and free the page.
> +	 *
> +	 * - If this was an order-0 page, we're done.
> +	 *
> +	 * - If the page was compound, the other side will free the
> +	 *   entire page and we're done here as well. Just note that
> +	 *   freeing clears PG_head, so it can only be read reliably
> +	 *   before the put_page_testzero().
> +	 *
> +	 * - If the page was of higher order but NOT marked compound,
> +	 *   the other side will know nothing about our buddy pages
> +	 *   and only free the order-0 page at the start of our block.
> +	 *   We must split off and free the buddy pages here.
> +	 *
> +	 *   The buddy pages aren't individually refcounted, so they
> +	 *   can't have any pending speculative references themselves.
> +	 */
> +	if (order > 0 && !compound) {
> +		split_page_memcg(page, 1 << order);
>  		while (order-- > 0)
>  			free_the_page(page + (1 << order), order);
> +	}
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(__free_pages);
>  
> -- 
> 2.31.0