[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <06BA5599-2077-4DE4-8E2A-74BD222C7CDD@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2021 21:52:14 +0000
From: "Bae, Chang Seok" <chang.seok.bae@...el.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
CC: "bp@...e.de" <bp@...e.de>, "luto@...nel.org" <luto@...nel.org>,
"mingo@...nel.org" <mingo@...nel.org>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"Brown, Len" <len.brown@...el.com>,
"Hansen, Dave" <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
"Liu, Jing2" <jing2.liu@...el.com>,
"Shankar, Ravi V" <ravi.v.shankar@...el.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 16/22] x86/fpu/xstate: Extend the table to map state
components with features
On Mar 20, 2021, at 14:25, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> wrote:
>
> And you could have changed the existing table just so:
>
> static unsigned short xsave_cpuid_features[] __initdata = {
> [XFEATURE_FP] = X86_FEATURE_FPU,
> [XFEATURE_SSE] = X86_FEATURE_XMM,
> [XFEATURE_YMM] = X86_FEATURE_AVX,
> [XFEATURE_BNDREGS] = X86_FEATURE_MPX,
> [XFEATURE_BNDCSR] = X86_FEATURE_MPX,
> [XFEATURE_OPMASK] = X86_FEATURE_AVX512F,
> [XFEATURE_ZMM_Hi256] = X86_FEATURE_AVX512F,
> [XFEATURE_Hi16_ZMM] = X86_FEATURE_AVX512F,
> [XFEATURE_PT_UNIMPLEMENTED_SO_FAR] = X86_FEATURE_INTEL_PT,
> [XFEATURE_PKRU] = X86_FEATURE_PKU,
> [XFEATURE_PASID] = X86_FEATURE_ENQCMD,
> };
>
> and the implementation to:
>
> for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(xsave_cpuid_features); i++) {
> - if (xsave_cpuid_features[i] || !boot_cpu_has(xsave_cpuid_features[i]))
> + if (xsave_cpuid_features[i] || !boot_cpu_has(xsave_cpuid_features[i]))
> xfeatures_mask_all &= ~BIT_ULL(i);
>
> Even with the gaps for XTILE the table is smaller, the code is simpler…
True, I will follow your suggestion. Maybe follow-up with a new patch before
posting v5.
Thank you for the suggestion.
Chang
Powered by blists - more mailing lists