lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <MWHPR11MB1599940F32F478311285F3AEF0649@MWHPR11MB1599.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Date:   Tue, 23 Mar 2021 21:54:57 +0000
From:   "Kaneda, Erik" <erik.kaneda@...el.com>
To:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
        "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>
CC:     "Wysocki, Rafael J" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
        Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@...cle.com>,
        Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
        "Moore, Robert" <robert.moore@...el.com>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        "Christoph Lameter" <cl@...ux.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        "Marco Elver" <elver@...gle.com>, Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        "ACPI Devel Maling List" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
        Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@...mens.com>
Subject: RE: slub freelist issue / BUG: unable to handle page fault for
 address: 000000003ffe0018



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@...nel.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2021 12:03 PM
> To: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill@...temov.name>; Kaneda, Erik
> <erik.kaneda@...el.com>
> Cc: Wysocki, Rafael J <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>; Vegard Nossum
> <vegard.nossum@...cle.com>; Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>; Rafael J.
> Wysocki <rafael@...nel.org>; Moore, Robert <robert.moore@...el.com>;
> Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>; Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>;
> Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>; Marco Elver
> <elver@...gle.com>; Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>; LKML <linux-
> kernel@...r.kernel.org>; Linux MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>; ACPI Devel
> Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>; Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>;
> Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>; Jan Kiszka
> <jan.kiszka@...mens.com>
> Subject: Re: slub freelist issue / BUG: unable to handle page fault for
> address: 000000003ffe0018
> 
> On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 7:32 PM Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill@...temov.name>
> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Jun 12, 2020 at 02:26:58PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > On 6/11/2020 3:40 AM, Kaneda, Erik wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@...cle.com>
> > > > > Sent: Friday, June 5, 2020 7:45 AM
> > > > > To: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>; Rafael J. Wysocki
> > > > > <rafael@...nel.org>; Moore, Robert <robert.moore@...el.com>;
> Kaneda,
> > > > > Erik <erik.kaneda@...el.com>
> > > > > Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>; Wysocki, Rafael J
> > > > > <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>; Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>;
> Andrew
> > > > > Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>; Marco Elver
> <elver@...gle.com>;
> > > > > Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>; LKML <linux-
> > > > > kernel@...r.kernel.org>; Linux MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>; ACPI
> Devel
> > > > > Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>; Len Brown
> <lenb@...nel.org>;
> > > > > Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
> > > > > Subject: Re: slub freelist issue / BUG: unable to handle page fault for
> > > > > address: 000000003ffe0018
> > > > >
> > > > > On 2020-06-05 16:08, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> > > > > > On 6/5/20 3:12 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > > > > > On Fri, Jun 5, 2020 at 2:48 PM Vegard Nossum
> > > > > <vegard.nossum@...cle.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > On 2020-06-05 11:36, Vegard Nossum wrote:
> > > > > > > > > On 2020-06-05 11:11, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > On 6/4/20 8:46 PM, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > On 6/4/20 7:57 PM, Kees Cook wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jun 04, 2020 at 07:20:18PM +0200, Vegard
> Nossum wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > On 2020-06-04 19:18, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 6/4/20 7:14 PM, Vegard Nossum wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi all,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I ran into a boot problem with latest linus/master
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > (6929f71e46bdddbf1c4d67c2728648176c67c555)
> that manifests
> > > > > like this:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi, what's the .config you use?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Pretty much x86_64 defconfig minus a few options (PCI,
> USB,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > ...)
> > > > > > > > > > > > Oh yes indeed. I immediately crash in the same way with
> this config.
> > > > > > > > > > > > I'll
> > > > > > > > > > > > start digging...
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > (defconfig finishes boot)
> > > > > > > > > > > This is funny, booting with slub_debug=F results in:
> > > > > > > > > > > I'm not sure if it's ACPI or ftrace wrong here, but looks like
> > > > > > > > > > > the changed free pointer offset merely exposes a bug in
> something
> > > > > > > > > > > else.
> > > > > > > > > > So, with Kees' patch reverted, booting with slub_debug=F
> (or even
> > > > > > > > > > more specific slub_debug=F,ftrace_event_field) also hits
> this bug
> > > > > > > > > > below. I wanted to bisect it, but v5.7 was also bad, and also
> > > > > > > > > > v5.6. Didn't try further in history. So it's not new at all, and
> > > > > > > > > > likely very specific to your config+QEMU? (and related to the
> ACPI
> > > > > > > > > > error messages that precede it?).
> > > > > > > > > I see it too, but not on v5.0. I can bisect it.
> > > > > > > > commit 67a72420a326b45514deb3f212085fb2cd1595b5
> > > > > > > > Author: Bob Moore <robert.moore@...el.com>
> > > > > > > > Date:   Fri Aug 16 14:43:21 2019 -0700
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >        ACPICA: Increase total number of possible Owner IDs
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >        ACPICA commit
> 1f1652dad88b9d767767bc1f7eb4f7d99e6b5324
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >        From 255 to 4095 possible IDs.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >        Link: https://github.com/acpica/acpica/commit/1f1652da
> > > > > > > >        Reported-by: Hedi Berriche <hedi.berriche @hpe.com>
> > > > > > > >        Signed-off-by: Bob Moore <robert.moore@...el.com>
> > > > > > > >        Signed-off-by: Erik Schmauss <erik.schmauss@...el.com>
> > > > > > > >        Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki
> <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
> > > > > > > Bob, Erik, did we miss something in that patch?
> > > > > > Maybe the patch just changes layout in a way that exposes the bug.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Anyway the "ftrace_event_field" cache is not really involved, this is
> > > > > > just because of slab merging. After adding "slub_nomerge" to
> > > > > > "slub_debug=F", it starts making more sense, as the cache becomes
> > > > > > Acpi-Namespace
> > > > > >
> > > > > > [    0.140408] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> > > > > > [    0.140837] cache_from_obj: Wrong slab cache. Acpi-Namespace
> but
> > > > > object is from kmalloc-64
> > > > > > [    0.141406] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1 at mm/slab.h:524
> > > > > kmem_cache_free+0x1d3/0x250
> > > > > > [    0.142105] CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 5.7.0+ #45
> > > > > > [    0.142393] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX,
> 1996),
> > > > > BIOS rel-1.13.0-0-gf21b5a4-rebuilt.opensuse.org 04/01/2014
> > > > > > [    0.142393] RIP: 0010:kmem_cache_free+0x1d3/0x250
> > > > > > [    0.142393] Code: 18 4d 85 ed 0f 84 10 ff ff ff 4c 39 ed 74 2f 49 8b 4d
> 58 48
> > > > > 8b 55 58 48 c7 c6 10 47 a1 ac 48 c7 c7 00 c2 b0 ac e8 b1 cc eb ff <0f> 0b
> 48 89 de
> > > > > 4c 89 ef e8 10 d7 ff ff 48 8b 15 59 36 9b 00 4c 89
> > > > > > [    0.142393] RSP: 0018:ffffb39cc0013dc0 EFLAGS: 00010282
> > > > > > [    0.142393] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff937287409e00 RCX:
> > > > > 0000000000000000
> > > > > > [    0.142393] RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 0000000000000092 RDI:
> > > > > ffffffffacfdd32c
> > > > > > [    0.142393] RBP: ffff93728742ef00 R08: ffffb39cc0013c7d R09:
> > > > > 00000000000000fc
> > > > > > [    0.142393] R10: ffffb39cc0013c78 R11: ffffb39cc0013c7d R12:
> > > > > ffff937307409e00
> > > > > > [    0.142393] R13: ffff937287401d00 R14: 0000000000000000 R15:
> > > > > 0000000000000000
> > > > > > [    0.142393] FS:  0000000000000000(0000)
> GS:ffff937287a00000(0000)
> > > > > knlGS:0000000000000000
> > > > > > [    0.142393] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
> > > > > > [    0.142393] CR2: 0000000000000000 CR3: 0000000003a0a000 CR4:
> > > > > 00000000003406f0
> > > > > > [    0.142393] Call Trace:
> > > > > > [    0.142393]  acpi_os_release_object+0x5/0x10
> > > > > > [    0.142393]  acpi_ns_delete_children+0x46/0x59
> > > > > > [    0.142393]  acpi_ns_delete_namespace_subtree+0x5c/0x79
> > > > > > [    0.142393]  ? acpi_sleep_proc_init+0x1f/0x1f
> > > > > > [    0.142393]  acpi_ns_terminate+0xc/0x31
> > > > > > [    0.142393]  acpi_ut_subsystem_shutdown+0x45/0xa3
> > > > > > [    0.142393]  ? acpi_sleep_proc_init+0x1f/0x1f
> > > > > > [    0.142393]  acpi_terminate+0x5/0xf
> > > > > > [    0.142393]  acpi_init+0x27b/0x308
> > > > > > [    0.142393]  ? video_setup+0x79/0x79
> > > > > > [    0.142393]  do_one_initcall+0x7b/0x160
> > > > > > [    0.142393]  kernel_init_freeable+0x190/0x1f2
> > > > > > [    0.142393]  ? rest_init+0x9a/0x9a
> > > > > > [    0.142393]  kernel_init+0x5/0xf6
> > > > > > [    0.142393]  ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30
> > > > > > [    0.142393] ---[ end trace 3539f236ef812ba1 ]---
> > > > > > [    0.142396] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I've also changed the warning so it's not printed just once, and also
> > > > > > prints tracking info (see the hunk at the end of my mail, I'll turn this
> to a
> > > > > proper patch later).
> > > > > > With "slub_debug=FU slub_nomerge" there are now multiple
> warnings,
> > > > > but they all look the same:
> > > > > > [    0.143815] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> > > > > > [    0.144131] cache_from_obj: Wrong slab cache. Acpi-Namespace
> but
> > > > > object is from kmalloc-64
> > > > > > [    0.144929] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1 at mm/slab.h:524
> > > > > kmem_cache_free+0x1d3/0x250
> > > > > > [    0.145129] CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 5.7.0+ #45
> > > > > > [    0.145129] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX,
> 1996),
> > > > > BIOS rel-1.13.0-0-gf21b5a4-rebuilt.opensuse.org 04/01/2014
> > > > > > [    0.145129] RIP: 0010:kmem_cache_free+0x1d3/0x250
> > > > > > [    0.145129] Code: 18 4d 85 ed 0f 84 10 ff ff ff 4c 39 ed 74 2f 49 8b 4d
> 58 48
> > > > > 8b 55 58 48 c7 c6 10 47 c1 8d 48 c7 c7 00 c2 d0 8d e8 b1 cc eb ff <0f> 0b
> 48 89 de
> > > > > 4c 89 ef e8 10 d7 ff ff 48 8b 15 59 36 9b 00 4c 89
> > > > > > [    0.145129] RSP: 0018:ffff990b80013dc0 EFLAGS: 00010282
> > > > > > [    0.145129] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff972d474ada80 RCX:
> > > > > 0000000000000000
> > > > > > [    0.145129] RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 0000000000000092 RDI:
> > > > > ffffffff8e1dd32c
> > > > > > [    0.145129] RBP: ffff972d47425680 R08: ffff990b80013c7d R09:
> > > > > 00000000000000fc
> > > > > > [    0.145129] R10: ffff990b80013c78 R11: ffff990b80013c7d R12:
> > > > > ffff972dc74ada80
> > > > > > [    0.145129] R13: ffff972d474038c0 R14: 0000000000000000 R15:
> > > > > 0000000000000000
> > > > > > [    0.145129] FS:  0000000000000000(0000)
> GS:ffff972d47a00000(0000)
> > > > > knlGS:0000000000000000
> > > > > > [    0.145129] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
> > > > > > [    0.145129] CR2: 0000000000000000 CR3: 000000000660a000 CR4:
> > > > > 00000000003406f0
> > > > > > [    0.145129] Call Trace:
> > > > > > [    0.145129]  acpi_os_release_object+0x5/0x10
> > > > > > [    0.145129]  acpi_ns_delete_children+0x46/0x59
> > > > > > [    0.145129]  acpi_ns_delete_namespace_subtree+0x5c/0x79
> > > > > > [    0.145129]  ? acpi_sleep_proc_init+0x1f/0x1f
> > > > > > [    0.145129]  acpi_ns_terminate+0xc/0x31
> > > > > > [    0.145129]  acpi_ut_subsystem_shutdown+0x45/0xa3
> > > > > > [    0.145129]  ? acpi_sleep_proc_init+0x1f/0x1f
> > > > > > [    0.145129]  acpi_terminate+0x5/0xf
> > > > > > [    0.145129]  acpi_init+0x27b/0x308
> > > > > > [    0.145129]  ? video_setup+0x79/0x79
> > > > > > [    0.145129]  do_one_initcall+0x7b/0x160
> > > > > > [    0.145129]  kernel_init_freeable+0x190/0x1f2
> > > > > > [    0.145129]  ? rest_init+0x9a/0x9a
> > > > > > [    0.145129]  kernel_init+0x5/0xf6
> > > > > > [    0.145129]  ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30
> > > > > > [    0.145129] ---[ end trace 574554fca7bd06bb ]---
> > > > > > [    0.145133] INFO: Allocated in acpi_ns_root_initialize+0xb6/0x2d1
> age=58
> > > > > cpu=0 pid=0
> > > > > > [    0.145881]  kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x1a9/0x1c0
> > > > > > [    0.146132]  acpi_ns_root_initialize+0xb6/0x2d1
> > > > > > [    0.146578]  acpi_initialize_subsystem+0x65/0xa8
> > > > > > [    0.147024]  acpi_early_init+0x5d/0xd1
> > > > > > [    0.147132]  start_kernel+0x45b/0x518
> > > > > > [    0.147491]  secondary_startup_64+0xb6/0xc0
> > > > > > [    0.147897] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> > > > > >
> > > > > > And it seems ACPI is allocating an object via kmalloc() and then
> > > > > > freeing it via kmem_cache_free(<"Acpi-Namespace"
> kmem_cache>) which
> > > > > is wrong.
> > > > > > > ./scripts/faddr2line vmlinux 'acpi_ns_root_initialize+0xb6'
> > > > > > acpi_ns_root_initialize+0xb6/0x2d1:
> > > > > > kmalloc at include/linux/slab.h:555
> > > > > > (inlined by) kzalloc at include/linux/slab.h:669 (inlined by)
> > > > > > acpi_os_allocate_zeroed at include/acpi/platform/aclinuxex.h:57
> > > > > > (inlined by) acpi_ns_root_initialize at
> > > > > > drivers/acpi/acpica/nsaccess.c:102
> > > > > >
> > > > Hi Vegard,
> > > >
> > > > > That's it :-) This fixes it for me:
> > > > We'll take this patch for ACPICA and it will be in the next release.
> > > >
> > > > Rafael, do you want to take this as a part of the next rc?
> > >
> > > Yes, I do.
> >
Hi,

> > Folks, what happened to the patch? I don't see it in current upstream.
> >
> > Looks like it got reported again:
> >
> > https://lore.kernel.org/r/a1461e21-c744-767d-6dfc-
> 6641fd3e3ce2@...mens.com
> 
> Well, I'm actually not sure.
> 
> Erik?

Sorry about that. It looks like I missed this. I've submitted a pull request for the ACPICA upstream here: https://github.com/acpica/acpica/pull/680
I've also submitted a Linux-ized version of the patch to the mailing list. Rafael, please take the submitted patch for the next rc.

Thanks and sorry for the mistake!
Erik

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ