lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 23 Mar 2021 23:30:07 +0100
From:   Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:     Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Cc:     Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Xu <dxu@...uu.xyz>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        bpf@...r.kernel.org, kuba@...nel.org, mingo@...hat.com,
        ast@...nel.org, tglx@...utronix.de, kernel-team@...com, yhs@...com,
        Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
        linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org,
        Abhishek Sagar <sagar.abhishek@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -tip v4 10/12] x86/kprobes: Push a fake return address at
 kretprobe_trampoline

On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 03:41:40PM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
>  	".global kretprobe_trampoline\n"
>  	".type kretprobe_trampoline, @function\n"
>  	"kretprobe_trampoline:\n"
>  #ifdef CONFIG_X86_64

So what happens if we get an NMI here? That is, after the RET but before
the push? Then our IP points into the trampoline but we've not done that
push yet.

> +	/* Push fake return address to tell the unwinder it's a kretprobe */
> +	"	pushq $kretprobe_trampoline\n"
>  	UNWIND_HINT_FUNC
> +	/* Save the sp-8, this will be fixed later */
> +	"	pushq %rsp\n"
>  	"	pushfq\n"
>  	SAVE_REGS_STRING
>  	"	movq %rsp, %rdi\n"
>  	"	call trampoline_handler\n"
>  	RESTORE_REGS_STRING
> +	"	addq $8, %rsp\n"
>  	"	popfq\n"

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ