| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <YFpy26JZRpZASB7R@google.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2021 15:59:39 -0700
From: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>
To: Chao Yu <yuchao0@...wei.com>
Cc: linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, chao@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] f2fs: fix to avoid selecting full segment w/
{AT,}SSR allocator
On 03/19, Chao Yu wrote:
> On 2021/3/19 1:17, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > On 02/20, Chao Yu wrote:
> > > In cp disabling mode, there could be a condition
> > > - target segment has 128 ckpt valid blocks
> > > - GC migrates 128 valid blocks to other segment (segment is still in
> > > dirty list)
> > > - GC migrates 384 blocks to target segment (segment has 128 cp_vblocks
> > > and 384 vblocks)
> > > - If GC selects target segment via {AT,}SSR allocator, however there is
> > > no free space in targe segment.
> > >
> > > Fixes: 4354994f097d ("f2fs: checkpoint disabling")
> > > Fixes: 093749e296e2 ("f2fs: support age threshold based garbage collection")
> > > Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@...wei.com>
> > > ---
> > > fs/f2fs/f2fs.h | 1 +
> > > fs/f2fs/gc.c | 17 +++++++++++++----
> > > fs/f2fs/segment.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
> > > 3 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> > > index ed7807103c8e..9c753eff0814 100644
> > > --- a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> > > +++ b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> > > @@ -3376,6 +3376,7 @@ block_t f2fs_get_unusable_blocks(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi);
> > > int f2fs_disable_cp_again(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, block_t unusable);
> > > void f2fs_release_discard_addrs(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi);
> > > int f2fs_npages_for_summary_flush(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, bool for_ra);
> > > +bool segment_has_free_slot(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, int segno);
> > > void f2fs_init_inmem_curseg(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi);
> > > void f2fs_save_inmem_curseg(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi);
> > > void f2fs_restore_inmem_curseg(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi);
> > > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/gc.c b/fs/f2fs/gc.c
> > > index 86ba8ed0b8a7..a1d8062cdace 100644
> > > --- a/fs/f2fs/gc.c
> > > +++ b/fs/f2fs/gc.c
> > > @@ -392,10 +392,6 @@ static void add_victim_entry(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
> > > if (p->gc_mode == GC_AT &&
> > > get_valid_blocks(sbi, segno, true) == 0)
> > > return;
> > > -
> > > - if (p->alloc_mode == AT_SSR &&
> > > - get_seg_entry(sbi, segno)->ckpt_valid_blocks == 0)
> > > - return;
> > > }
> > > for (i = 0; i < sbi->segs_per_sec; i++)
> > > @@ -736,6 +732,19 @@ static int get_victim_by_default(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
> > > if (gc_type == BG_GC && test_bit(secno, dirty_i->victim_secmap))
> > > goto next;
> > > + if (unlikely(is_sbi_flag_set(sbi, SBI_CP_DISABLED))) {
> > > + /*
> > > + * to avoid selecting candidate which has below valid
> > > + * block distribution:
> > > + * partial blocks are valid and all left ones are valid
> > > + * in previous checkpoint.
> > > + */
> > > + if (p.alloc_mode == SSR || p.alloc_mode == AT_SSR) {
> > > + if (!segment_has_free_slot(sbi, segno))
> > > + goto next;
> >
> > Do we need to change this to check free_slot instead of get_ckpt_valid_blocks()?
>
> Jaegeuk,
>
> LFS was assigned only for GC case, in this case we are trying to select source
> section, rather than target segment for SSR/AT_SSR case, so we don't need to
> check free_slot.
>
> - f2fs_gc
> - __get_victim
> - get_victim(sbi, victim, gc_type, NO_CHECK_TYPE, LFS, 0);
>
> >
> > 732 if (unlikely(is_sbi_flag_set(sbi, SBI_CP_DISABLED) &&
> > 733 get_ckpt_valid_blocks(sbi, segno) &&
> > 734 p.alloc_mode == LFS))
>
> BTW, in LFS mode, GC wants to find source section rather than segment, so we
> should change to check valid ckpt blocks in every segment of targe section here?
Alright. I refactored a bit on this patch with new one. Could you please take a look?
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jaegeuk/f2fs.git/commit/?h=dev&id=00152bd7cabd69b4615ebead823ff23887b0e0f7
Thanks,
>
> Thanks,
>
> >
> >
> > > + }
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > if (is_atgc) {
> > > add_victim_entry(sbi, &p, segno);
> > > goto next;
> > > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/segment.c b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> > > index 2d5a82c4ca15..deaf57e13125 100644
> > > --- a/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> > > +++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> > > @@ -2650,6 +2650,26 @@ static void __refresh_next_blkoff(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
> > > seg->next_blkoff++;
> > > }
> > > +bool segment_has_free_slot(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, int segno)
> > > +{
> > > + struct sit_info *sit = SIT_I(sbi);
> > > + struct seg_entry *se = get_seg_entry(sbi, segno);
> > > + int entries = SIT_VBLOCK_MAP_SIZE / sizeof(unsigned long);
> > > + unsigned long *target_map = SIT_I(sbi)->tmp_map;
> > > + unsigned long *ckpt_map = (unsigned long *)se->ckpt_valid_map;
> > > + unsigned long *cur_map = (unsigned long *)se->cur_valid_map;
> > > + int i, pos;
> > > +
> > > + down_write(&sit->sentry_lock);
> > > + for (i = 0; i < entries; i++)
> > > + target_map[i] = ckpt_map[i] | cur_map[i];
> > > +
> > > + pos = __find_rev_next_zero_bit(target_map, sbi->blocks_per_seg, 0);
> > > + up_write(&sit->sentry_lock);
> > > +
> > > + return pos < sbi->blocks_per_seg;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > /*
> > > * This function always allocates a used segment(from dirty seglist) by SSR
> > > * manner, so it should recover the existing segment information of valid blocks
> > > --
> > > 2.29.2
> > .
> >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists