[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YFmRcPUxxFxkuMkr@vkoul-mobl.Dlink>
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2021 12:27:52 +0530
From: Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
To: Bard Liao <yung-chuan.liao@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: alsa-devel@...a-project.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org,
rander.wang@...ux.intel.com, hui.wang@...onical.com,
pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com, sanyog.r.kale@...el.com,
bard.liao@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] soundwire: add slave device to linked list after
device_register()
On 23-03-21, 10:25, Bard Liao wrote:
> From: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>
>
> We currently add the slave device to a linked list before
> device_register(), and then remove it if device_register() fails.
>
> It's not clear why this sequence was necessary, this patch moves the
> linked list management to after the device_register().
Maybe add a comment :-)
The reason here is that before calling device_register() we need to be
ready and completely initialized. device_register is absolutely the last
step in the flow, always.
The probe of the device can happen and before you get a chance to
add to list, many number of things can happen.. So adding after is not a
very good idea :)
HTH
>
> Suggested-by: Keyon Jie <yang.jie@...ux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Guennadi Liakhovetski <guennadi.liakhovetski@...ux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Bard Liao <yung-chuan.liao@...ux.intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/soundwire/slave.c | 11 +++++------
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/soundwire/slave.c b/drivers/soundwire/slave.c
> index 112b21967c7a..0c92db2e1ddc 100644
> --- a/drivers/soundwire/slave.c
> +++ b/drivers/soundwire/slave.c
> @@ -65,9 +65,6 @@ int sdw_slave_add(struct sdw_bus *bus,
> for (i = 0; i < SDW_MAX_PORTS; i++)
> init_completion(&slave->port_ready[i]);
>
> - mutex_lock(&bus->bus_lock);
> - list_add_tail(&slave->node, &bus->slaves);
> - mutex_unlock(&bus->bus_lock);
>
> ret = device_register(&slave->dev);
> if (ret) {
> @@ -77,13 +74,15 @@ int sdw_slave_add(struct sdw_bus *bus,
> * On err, don't free but drop ref as this will be freed
> * when release method is invoked.
> */
> - mutex_lock(&bus->bus_lock);
> - list_del(&slave->node);
> - mutex_unlock(&bus->bus_lock);
> put_device(&slave->dev);
>
> return ret;
> }
> +
> + mutex_lock(&bus->bus_lock);
> + list_add_tail(&slave->node, &bus->slaves);
> + mutex_unlock(&bus->bus_lock);
> +
> sdw_slave_debugfs_init(slave);
>
> return ret;
> --
> 2.17.1
--
~Vinod
Powered by blists - more mailing lists