linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] clk: qcom: camcc: Update the clock ops for the SC7180

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <161648457933.3012082.10324281519544090271@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com>
Date:   Tue, 23 Mar 2021 00:29:39 -0700
From:   Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
To:     Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        Taniya Das <tdas@...eaurora.org>
Cc:     Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@...eaurora.org>,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-soc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Taniya Das <tdas@...eaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: qcom: camcc: Update the clock ops for the SC7180

Quoting Taniya Das (2021-03-19 00:47:34)
> Update the RCGs to use shared ops to park the RCGs at XO.

s/Update/fix/?

Can you also elaborate more on why we need to park the RCGs here for all
these different clks? Is the camera driver supposed to not touch these
and let the firmware take over? Is there zero coordination between the
kernel and the firmware?

> 
> Fixes: 15d09e830bbc ("clk: qcom: camcc: Add camera clock controller driver for SC7180")
> Signed-off-by: Taniya Das <tdas@...eaurora.org>