[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210323083701.aqc2qmktoaunnp4b@vireshk-i7>
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2021 14:07:01 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: Jie Deng <jie.deng@...el.com>
Cc: linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mst@...hat.com, wsa@...nel.org,
jasowang@...hat.com, wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com,
andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com, conghui.chen@...el.com,
arnd@...db.de, kblaiech@...lanox.com,
jarkko.nikula@...ux.intel.com, Sergey.Semin@...kalelectronics.ru,
rppt@...nel.org, loic.poulain@...aro.org, tali.perry1@...il.com,
u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de, bjorn.andersson@...aro.org,
yu1.wang@...el.com, shuo.a.liu@...el.com, stefanha@...hat.com,
pbonzini@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10] i2c: virtio: add a virtio i2c frontend driver
On 23-03-21, 16:33, Jie Deng wrote:
> On 2021/3/23 15:27, Viresh Kumar wrote:
>
> > On 23-03-21, 22:19, Jie Deng wrote:
> > > +static int __maybe_unused virtio_i2c_freeze(struct virtio_device *vdev)
> > > +{
> > > + virtio_i2c_del_vqs(vdev);
> > > + return 0;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static int __maybe_unused virtio_i2c_restore(struct virtio_device *vdev)
> > > +{
> > > + return virtio_i2c_setup_vqs(vdev->priv);
> > > +}
> > Sorry for not looking at this earlier, but shouldn't we enclose the above two
> > within #ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP instead and drop the __maybe_unused ?
>
>
> I remembered I was suggested to use "__maybe_unused" instead of "#ifdef".
>
> You may check this https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/732981/
>
> The reason may be something like that.
Ahh, thanks for the link Jie. Okay you can leave it as is.
--
viresh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists