linux-kernel - Re: [RFC RESEND PATCH v2 0/8] Add managed version of delayed work init

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YFniWnUwQ7CY7wEM@kroah.com>
Date:   Tue, 23 Mar 2021 13:43:06 +0100
From:   Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Matti Vaittinen <matti.vaittinen@...rohmeurope.com>
Cc:     Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@...il.com>,
        MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@...sung.com>,
        Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>,
        Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.com>,
        Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
        Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
        Mark Gross <mgross@...ux.intel.com>,
        Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>,
        Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ux-watchdog.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org, platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC RESEND PATCH v2 0/8] Add managed version of delayed work
 init

On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 09:41:13AM +0200, Matti Vaittinen wrote:
> It's not rare that device drivers need delayed work.
> It's not rare that this work needs driver's data.

I don't normally comment on "RFC" patch series as I can't take them and
the submitter doesn't feel right with them being merged at this point in
time.

So if you think this is all correct now, please resubmit without that so
we can review it properly :)

thanks,

greg k-h