linux-kernel - [RFC PATCH v7 04/22] af_vsock: implement SEQPACKET receive loop

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20210323131006.2460058-1-arseny.krasnov@kaspersky.com>
Date:   Tue, 23 Mar 2021 16:10:03 +0300
From:   Arseny Krasnov <arseny.krasnov@...persky.com>
To:     Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@...hat.com>,
        Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com>,
        "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
        Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Jorgen Hansen <jhansen@...are.com>,
        Andra Paraschiv <andraprs@...zon.com>,
        Norbert Slusarek <nslusarek@....net>,
        Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>,
        Jeff Vander Stoep <jeffv@...gle.com>,
        Alexander Popov <alex.popov@...ux.com>
CC:     <kvm@...r.kernel.org>, <virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
        <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <stsp2@...dex.ru>, <arseny.krasnov@...persky.com>,
        <oxffffaa@...il.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH v7 04/22] af_vsock: implement SEQPACKET receive loop

This adds receive loop for SEQPACKET. It looks like receive loop for
STREAM, but there is a little bit difference:
1) It doesn't call notify callbacks.
2) It doesn't care about 'SO_SNDLOWAT' and 'SO_RCVLOWAT' values, because
   there is no sense for these values in SEQPACKET case.
3) It waits until whole record is received or error is found during
   receiving.
4) It processes and sets 'MSG_TRUNC' flag.

So to avoid extra conditions for two types of socket inside one loop, two
independent functions were created.

Signed-off-by: Arseny Krasnov <arseny.krasnov@...persky.com>
---
 v6 -> v7:
 'seqpacket_get_len' callback now removed, length of message is returned
  by 'seqpacket_dequeue' callback.

 include/net/af_vsock.h   |  4 ++
 net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c | 88 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 2 files changed, 91 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/include/net/af_vsock.h b/include/net/af_vsock.h
index b1c717286993..74ac8a4c4168 100644
--- a/include/net/af_vsock.h
+++ b/include/net/af_vsock.h
@@ -135,6 +135,10 @@ struct vsock_transport {
 	bool (*stream_is_active)(struct vsock_sock *);
 	bool (*stream_allow)(u32 cid, u32 port);
 
+	/* SEQ_PACKET. */
+	int (*seqpacket_dequeue)(struct vsock_sock *vsk, struct msghdr *msg,
+				 int flags, bool *msg_ready, size_t *record_len);
+
 	/* Notification. */
 	int (*notify_poll_in)(struct vsock_sock *, size_t, bool *);
 	int (*notify_poll_out)(struct vsock_sock *, size_t, bool *);
diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
index 0bc661e54262..fa0c37f97330 100644
--- a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
+++ b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
@@ -1973,6 +1973,89 @@ static int __vsock_stream_recvmsg(struct sock *sk, struct msghdr *msg,
 	return err;
 }
 
+static int __vsock_seqpacket_recvmsg(struct sock *sk, struct msghdr *msg,
+				     size_t len, int flags)
+{
+	const struct vsock_transport *transport;
+	const struct iovec *orig_iov;
+	unsigned long orig_nr_segs;
+	bool msg_ready;
+	struct vsock_sock *vsk;
+	size_t record_len;
+	long timeout;
+	int err = 0;
+	DEFINE_WAIT(wait);
+
+	vsk = vsock_sk(sk);
+	transport = vsk->transport;
+
+	timeout = sock_rcvtimeo(sk, flags & MSG_DONTWAIT);
+	orig_nr_segs = msg->msg_iter.nr_segs;
+	orig_iov = msg->msg_iter.iov;
+	msg_ready = false;
+	record_len = 0;
+
+	while (1) {
+		err = vsock_wait_data(sk, &wait, timeout, NULL, 0);
+
+		if (err <= 0) {
+			/* In case of any loop break(timeout, signal
+			 * interrupt or shutdown), we report user that
+			 * nothing was copied.
+			 */
+			err = 0;
+			break;
+		}
+
+		err = transport->seqpacket_dequeue(vsk, msg, flags, &msg_ready, &record_len);
+
+		if (err < 0) {
+			if (err == -EAGAIN) {
+				iov_iter_init(&msg->msg_iter, READ,
+					      orig_iov, orig_nr_segs,
+					      len);
+				/* Clear 'MSG_EOR' here, because dequeue
+				 * callback above set it again if it was
+				 * set by sender. This 'MSG_EOR' is from
+				 * dropped record.
+				 */
+				msg->msg_flags &= ~MSG_EOR;
+				record_len = 0;
+				continue;
+			}
+
+			err = -ENOMEM;
+			break;
+		}
+
+		if (msg_ready)
+			break;
+	}
+
+	if (sk->sk_err)
+		err = -sk->sk_err;
+	else if (sk->sk_shutdown & RCV_SHUTDOWN)
+		err = 0;
+
+	if (msg_ready) {
+		/* User sets MSG_TRUNC, so return real length of
+		 * packet.
+		 */
+		if (flags & MSG_TRUNC)
+			err = record_len;
+		else
+			err = len - msg->msg_iter.count;
+
+		/* Always set MSG_TRUNC if real length of packet is
+		 * bigger than user's buffer.
+		 */
+		if (record_len > len)
+			msg->msg_flags |= MSG_TRUNC;
+	}
+
+	return err;
+}
+
 static int
 vsock_connectible_recvmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg, size_t len,
 			  int flags)
@@ -2028,7 +2111,10 @@ vsock_connectible_recvmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg, size_t len,
 		goto out;
 	}
 
-	err = __vsock_stream_recvmsg(sk, msg, len, flags);
+	if (sk->sk_type == SOCK_STREAM)
+		err = __vsock_stream_recvmsg(sk, msg, len, flags);
+	else
+		err = __vsock_seqpacket_recvmsg(sk, msg, len, flags);
 
 out:
 	release_sock(sk);
-- 
2.25.1