linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] sched/fair: reduce long-tail newly idle balance cost

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 23 Mar 2021 14:44:57 +0100
From:   Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
To:     "Li, Aubrey" <aubrey.li@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     Aubrey Li <aubrey.li@...el.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
        Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>,
        Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>,
        Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
        Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>,
        Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>,
        "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] sched/fair: reduce long-tail newly idle balance cost

Hi Aurey,

On Tue, 16 Mar 2021 at 05:27, Li, Aubrey <aubrey.li@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> On 2021/2/24 16:15, Aubrey Li wrote:
> > A long-tail load balance cost is observed on the newly idle path,
> > this is caused by a race window between the first nr_running check
> > of the busiest runqueue and its nr_running recheck in detach_tasks.
> >
> > Before the busiest runqueue is locked, the tasks on the busiest
> > runqueue could be pulled by other CPUs and nr_running of the busiest
> > runqueu becomes 1 or even 0 if the running task becomes idle, this
> > causes detach_tasks breaks with LBF_ALL_PINNED flag set, and triggers
> > load_balance redo at the same sched_domain level.
> >
> > In order to find the new busiest sched_group and CPU, load balance will
> > recompute and update the various load statistics, which eventually leads
> > to the long-tail load balance cost.
> >
> > This patch clears LBF_ALL_PINNED flag for this race condition, and hence
> > reduces the long-tail cost of newly idle balance.
>
> Ping...

Reviewed-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>

>
> >
> > Cc: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
> > Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>
> > Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
> > Cc: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>
> > Cc: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>
> > Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Aubrey Li <aubrey.li@...ux.intel.com>
> > ---
> >  kernel/sched/fair.c | 9 +++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> > index 04a3ce2..5c67804 100644
> > --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> > +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> > @@ -7675,6 +7675,15 @@ static int detach_tasks(struct lb_env *env)
> >
> >       lockdep_assert_held(&env->src_rq->lock);
> >
> > +     /*
> > +      * Source run queue has been emptied by another CPU, clear
> > +      * LBF_ALL_PINNED flag as we will not test any task.
> > +      */
> > +     if (env->src_rq->nr_running <= 1) {
> > +             env->flags &= ~LBF_ALL_PINNED;
> > +             return 0;
> > +     }
> > +
> >       if (env->imbalance <= 0)
> >               return 0;
> >
> >
>