lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 23 Mar 2021 15:06:03 +0100
From:   Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>
To:     Daniel Palmer <daniel@...f.com>
Cc:     linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mtd: spinand: add support for Foresee FS35ND01G-S1Y2

Hi Daniel,

Daniel Palmer <daniel@...f.com> wrote on Tue, 23 Mar 2021 20:47:10
+0900:

> Hi Miquel,
> 
> On Tue, 23 Mar 2021 at 19:32, Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com> wrote:
> > You can run nandbiterrs -i /dev/mtdX
> >
> > You'll see if there is ECC correction or not (and its level).  
> 
> These are results I get for both of the nandbiterrs tests.
> 
> # nandbiterrs -i /dev/mtd1
> incremental biterrors test
> Successfully corrected 0 bit errors per subpage
> Inserted biterror @ 0/5
> Read reported 4 corrected bit errors
> ECC failure, invalid data despite read success

This is not a valid behavior. There is something wrong with the way ECC
status is read/retrieved. The read should indeed report 4 corrected bit
errors, but then the data should be valid. Here it means that the
introduced error appears corrected but in fact is not.

We need to understand what status are available and write the
appropriate vendor code.

Thanks,
Miquèl

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ