[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210323140647.GV2542@lahna.fi.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2021 16:06:47 +0200
From: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
To: Lv Yunlong <lyl2019@...l.ustc.edu.cn>
Cc: andreas.noever@...il.com, michael.jamet@...el.com,
YehezkelShB@...il.com, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] thunderbolt: Fix a double put in tb_cfg_read_raw
Hi,
On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 08:15:12PM -0700, Lv Yunlong wrote:
> In tb_cfg_read_raw, req is allocated by tb_cfg_request_alloc()
> with an initial reference. Before calling tb_cfg_request_sync(),
> there is no refcount inc operation. tb_cfg_request_sync()
> calls tb_cfg_request(..,req,..) and if the callee failed,
> the initial reference of req is dropped and req is freed.
>
> Later in tb_cfg_read_raw before the err check,
> tb_cfg_request_put(req) is called again. It may cause error
> in race.
Hmm, tb_cfg_request() does tb_cfg_request_get() too and in case of error
it does tb_cfg_request_put(). So the refcount should be fine. What am I
missing?
>
> My patch puts tb_cfg_request_put(req) after the err check
> finished to avoid unexpected result.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lv Yunlong <lyl2019@...l.ustc.edu.cn>
> ---
> drivers/thunderbolt/ctl.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/thunderbolt/ctl.c b/drivers/thunderbolt/ctl.c
> index f1aeaff9f368..bb60269c89ab 100644
> --- a/drivers/thunderbolt/ctl.c
> +++ b/drivers/thunderbolt/ctl.c
> @@ -890,11 +890,11 @@ struct tb_cfg_result tb_cfg_read_raw(struct tb_ctl *ctl, void *buffer,
>
> res = tb_cfg_request_sync(ctl, req, timeout_msec);
>
> - tb_cfg_request_put(req);
> -
> if (res.err != -ETIMEDOUT)
> break;
>
> + tb_cfg_request_put(req);
> +
> /* Wait a bit (arbitrary time) until we send a retry */
> usleep_range(10, 100);
> }
> --
> 2.25.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists