linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 2/8] MAINTAINERS: Add entry for devm helpers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YFn5CSB1O3i+SzgR@kroah.com>
Date:   Tue, 23 Mar 2021 15:19:53 +0100
From:   Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
Cc:     Matti Vaittinen <matti.vaittinen@...rohmeurope.com>,
        Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@...il.com>,
        MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@...sung.com>,
        Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>,
        Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.com>,
        Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
        Mark Gross <mgross@...ux.intel.com>,
        Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>,
        Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ux-watchdog.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org, platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/8] MAINTAINERS: Add entry for devm helpers

On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 02:58:28PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On 3/23/21 2:56 PM, Matti Vaittinen wrote:
> > Devm helper header containing small inline helpers was added.
> > Hans promised to maintain it.
> > 
> > Add Hans as maintainer and myself as designated reviewer.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Matti Vaittinen <matti.vaittinen@...rohmeurope.com>
> 
> Yes I did promise that, didn't I?  FWIW going this route is still
> fine by me, assuming that having someone else maintain this makes
> this easier on / more acceptable to Greg.
> 
> Ultimately this is up to Greg though, so lets wait and see what
> Greg has to say about this.

Can we move some of the devm_* calls in include/device.h into here as
well so that you all can be in charge of them instead of me?

If so, I'm happy :)

Anyway, this looks sane, I'll queue it up and let's see what breaks in
linux-next...

thanks,

greg k-h