[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b65bf833-7167-e43f-717a-923dfa8bbc15@ozlabs.ru>
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2021 13:39:04 +1100
From: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@...abs.ru>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Max Gurtovoy <mgurtovoy@...dia.com>, cohuck@...hat.com,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
liranl@...dia.com, oren@...dia.com, tzahio@...dia.com,
leonro@...dia.com, yarong@...dia.com, aviadye@...dia.com,
shahafs@...dia.com, artemp@...dia.com, kwankhede@...dia.com,
ACurrid@...dia.com, cjia@...dia.com, yishaih@...dia.com,
mjrosato@...ux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/9] vfio/pci: export nvlink2 support into vendor vfio_pci
drivers
On 24/03/2021 06:32, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
>>> For NVIDIA GPU Max checked internally and we saw it looks very much
>>> like how Intel GPU works. Only some PCI IDs trigger checking on the
>>> feature the firmware thing is linked to.
>>
>> And as Alexey noted, the table came up incomplete. But also those same
>> devices exist on platforms where this extension is completely
>> irrelevant.
>
> I understood he ment that NVIDI GPUs *without* NVLINK can exist, but
> the ID table we have here is supposed to be the NVLINK compatible
> ID's.
I also meant there are more (than in the proposed list) GPUs with
NVLink which will work on P9.
--
Alexey
Powered by blists - more mailing lists