[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <810d36184b9fa2880d3ba7738a8f182e27f5107b.camel@perches.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2021 09:52:11 -0700
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>
Cc: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@....com>,
Marco Felsch <m.felsch@...gutronix.de>,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
Liu Ying <victor.liu@....com>,
dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [v2] drm/imx: imx-ldb: fix out of bounds array access
warning
On Wed, 2021-03-24 at 17:42 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 24, 2021 at 3:20 PM Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> wrote:
[]
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/imx/imx-ldb.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/imx/imx-ldb.c
> > []
> > > @@ -197,6 +197,12 @@ static void imx_ldb_encoder_enable(struct drm_encoder *encoder)
> > > int dual = ldb->ldb_ctrl & LDB_SPLIT_MODE_EN;
> > > int mux = drm_of_encoder_active_port_id(imx_ldb_ch->child, encoder);
> > >
> > > + if (mux < 0 || mux >= ARRAY_SIZE(ldb->clk_sel)) {
> > > + dev_warn(ldb->dev, "%s: invalid mux %d\n",
> > > + __func__, ERR_PTR(mux));
> >
> > This does not compile without warnings.
> >
> > drivers/gpu/drm/imx/imx-ldb.c: In function ‘imx_ldb_encoder_enable’:
> > drivers/gpu/drm/imx/imx-ldb.c:201:22: warning: format ‘%d’ expects argument of type ‘int’, but argument 4 has type ‘void *’ [-Wformat=]
> > 201 | dev_warn(ldb->dev, "%s: invalid mux %d\n",
> > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> >
> > If you want to use ERR_PTR, the %d should be %pe as ERR_PTR
> > is converting an int a void * to decode the error type and
> > emit it as a string.
>
> Sorry about that.
>
> I decided against using ERR_PTR() in order to also check for
> positive array overflow, but the version I tested was different from
> the version I sent.
>
> v3 coming.
Thanks. No worries.
Up to you, vsprintf would emit the positive mux as a funky hashed
hex value by default if you use ERR_PTR with mux > ARRAY_SIZE so
perhaps %d without the ERR_PTR use makes the most sense.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists