[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210324030224.GO1719932@casper.infradead.org>
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2021 03:02:24 +0000
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
To: Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
surenb@...gle.com, joaodias@...gle.com, jhubbard@...dia.com,
digetx@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] mm: cma: support sysfs
On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 12:50:50PM -0700, Minchan Kim wrote:
> + /* the number of CMA page successful allocations */
> + atomic64_t nr_pages_succeeded;
> +void cma_sysfs_alloc_pages_count(struct cma *cma, size_t count)
> +{
> + atomic64_add(count, &cma->nr_pages_succeeded);
> +}
I don't understand. A size_t is a byte count. But the variable is called
'nr_pages'. So which is it, a byte count or a page count?
> +static ssize_t alloc_pages_success_show(struct kobject *kobj,
> + struct kobj_attribute *attr, char *buf)
> +{
> + struct cma_kobject *cma_kobj = container_of(kobj,
> + struct cma_kobject, kobj);
> + struct cma *cma = cma_kobj->cma;
> +
> + return sysfs_emit(buf, "%llu\n",
> + atomic64_read(&cma->nr_pages_succeeded));
... if it's in bytes, it should probably be reported in kilobytes
and be suffixed with a 'K' like many other stats.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists