linux-kernel - Re: [RFC patch] vsprintf: Allow %pe to print non PTR

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <d184069de43135a9c9e5f031447faf98ab3f437d.camel@perches.com>
Date:   Wed, 24 Mar 2021 12:24:10 -0700
From:   Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To:     Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>,
        Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
        Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
        Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
        Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
        Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
        NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@....com>,
        Marco Felsch <m.felsch@...gutronix.de>,
        Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
        Liu Ying <victor.liu@....com>,
        dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC patch] vsprintf: Allow %pe to print non PTR_ERR %pe uses
 as decimal

On Wed, 2021-03-24 at 18:33 +0100, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
> On 24/03/2021 18.20, Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Wed, 2021-03-24 at 09:52 -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2021-03-24 at 17:42 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Mar 24, 2021 at 3:20 PM Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> wrote:
> > > []
> > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/imx/imx-ldb.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/imx/imx-ldb.c
> > > > > []
> > > > > > @@ -197,6 +197,12 @@ static void imx_ldb_encoder_enable(struct drm_encoder *encoder)
> > > > > >       int dual = ldb->ldb_ctrl & LDB_SPLIT_MODE_EN;
> > > > > >       int mux = drm_of_encoder_active_port_id(imx_ldb_ch->child, encoder);
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > +     if (mux < 0 || mux >= ARRAY_SIZE(ldb->clk_sel)) {
> > > > > > +             dev_warn(ldb->dev, "%s: invalid mux %d\n",
> > > > > > +                      __func__, ERR_PTR(mux));
> > > > > 
> > > > > This does not compile without warnings.
> > > > > 
> > > > > drivers/gpu/drm/imx/imx-ldb.c: In function ‘imx_ldb_encoder_enable’:
> > > > > drivers/gpu/drm/imx/imx-ldb.c:201:22: warning: format ‘%d’ expects argument of type ‘int’, but argument 4 has type ‘void *’ [-Wformat=]
> > > > >   201 |   dev_warn(ldb->dev, "%s: invalid mux %d\n",
> > > > >       |                      ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > > > > 
> > > > > If you want to use ERR_PTR, the %d should be %pe as ERR_PTR
> > > > > is converting an int a void * to decode the error type and
> > > > > emit it as a string.
> > > > 
> > > > Sorry about that.
> > > > 
> > > > I decided against using ERR_PTR() in order to also check for
> > > > positive array overflow, but the version I tested was different from
> > > > the version I sent.
> > > > 
> > > > v3 coming.
> > > 
> > > Thanks.  No worries.
> > > 
> > > Up to you, vsprintf would emit the positive mux as a funky hashed
> > > hex value by default if you use ERR_PTR with mux > ARRAY_SIZE so
> > > perhaps %d without the ERR_PTR use makes the most sense.
> > > 
> 
> > 
> > Maybe it's better to output non PTR_ERR %pe uses as decimal so this
> > sort of code would work.
> 
> No, because that would leak the pointer value when somebody has
> accidentally passed a real kernel pointer to %pe.

I think it's not really an issue.

_All_ code that uses %p<foo> extensions need inspection anyway.

It's already possible to intentionally 'leak' the ptr value
by using %pe, -ptr so I think that's not really an issue.

> 
> If the code wants a cute -EFOO string explaining what's wrong, what
> about "%pe", ERR_PTR(mux < 0 : mux : -ERANGE)? Or two separate error
> messages
> 
> if (mux < 0)
>   ...
> else if (mux >= ARRAY_SIZE())
>   ...

Multiple tests, more unnecessary code, multiple format strings, etc...