[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1ae3b0c3-be85-e6ba-ac17-3f83fc4dd087@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2021 17:45:33 -0500
From: Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Cc: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>,
Michal Marek <michal.lkml@...kovi.net>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
David Gibson <david@...son.dropbear.id.au>,
Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
Anmar Oueja <anmar.oueja@...aro.org>,
Bill Mills <bill.mills@...aro.org>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
Linux Kbuild mailing list <linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V11 3/5] kbuild: Allow .dtso format for overlay source
files
Hi Viresh,
On 3/24/21 2:34 AM, Frank Rowand wrote:
> On 3/16/21 12:42 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
>> On 16-03-21, 00:36, Frank Rowand wrote:
>>> I should have looked at patch 3/5 more carefully instead of counting on
>>> Masahiro to check it out and simply build testing.
>>>
>>> Patch 3/5 does not seem correct. I'll look over all the makefile related
>>> changes that have been accepted (if any) and patch 3/5 later today (Tuesday).
>>
>> What is already merged by Rob is what everyone reviewed and it wasn't
>> related to this .dtso/.dtbo discussion we are having. I will resend a
>> new patchset with the stuff left for merging (which will involve the
>> thing we are discussing here), so we can get a clear picture of it.
>>
>
> Instead of doing what I suggested in my 16-03-21, 00:36 email (only
> partly quoted above), I have made most of the changes to unittest.c
> and drivers/of/unitest/unittest-data/Makefile to allow the unittest
> .dts files to be .dtso source files and .dtbo FDT files, and tested.
> One final step remaining in my work is to actually rename the *.dts
> files to *.dtso.
>
> I hope to finish this later today (Wednesday) after getting some
> sleep.
I have submitted a patch that I _think_ removes the need for most
of patch 3/5, _other_ than the yaml rule, which I would assume is
still needed, though I did not examine it.
My patch is
https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210324223713.1334666-1-frowand.list@gmail.com
Can you do a new patch with just the yaml rule (if Rob accepts my patch).
-Frank
Powered by blists - more mailing lists