[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8e833f7c-ea24-1044-4c69-780a84b47ce1@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2021 00:39:01 +0100
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: Kai Huang <kai.huang@...el.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
x86@...nel.org, linux-sgx@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jarkko@...nel.org, luto@...nel.org,
dave.hansen@...el.com, rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com,
haitao.huang@...el.com, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com,
hpa@...or.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 03/25] x86/sgx: Wipe out EREMOVE from
sgx_free_epc_page()
On 25/03/21 00:23, Kai Huang wrote:
> I changed to below (with slight modification on Paolo's):
>
> /* Error message for EREMOVE failure, when kernel is about to leak EPC page */
> #define EREMOVE_ERROR_MESSAGE \
> "EREMOVE returned %d (0x%x) and an EPC page was leaked. SGX may become unusuable. " \
> "This is likely a kernel bug. Refer to Documentation/x86/sgx.rst for more information."
>
> I got a checkpatch warning however:
>
> WARNING: It's generally not useful to have the filename in the file
> #60: FILE: Documentation/x86/sgx.rst:223:
> +This is likely a kernel bug. Refer to Documentation/x86/sgx.rst for more
Yeah, this is more or less a false positive.
Paolo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists