linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] regulator: mt6360: remove redundant error print

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 24 Mar 2021 23:39:35 +0000
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Jian Dong <dj0227@....com>, matthias.bgg@...il.com
Cc:     Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Jian Dong <dongjian@...ong.com>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, huyue2@...ong.com,
        linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] regulator: mt6360: remove redundant error print

On Tue, 23 Mar 2021 20:22:41 +0800, Jian Dong wrote:
> fixes coccicheck warning:
> 
> drivers/regulator/mt6360-regulator.c:384:3-10: line 384 is
> redundant because platform_get_irq() already prints an error
> 
> in fact, it is not platform_get_irq but platform_get_irq_byname print error

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/regulator.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] regulator: mt6360: remove redundant error print
      commit: f56f2b953bccabb9bd283a734c7e35a1bb1c1ff8

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark