| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2021 11:59:03 +0800
From: Can Guo <cang@...eaurora.org>
To: Zang Leigang <zangleigang@...ilicon.com>
Cc: Avri Altman <avri.altman@....com>,
"James E . J . Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>,
yongmyung lee <ymhungry.lee@...sung.com>,
Daejun Park <daejun7.park@...sung.com>,
alim.akhtar@...sung.com, asutoshd@...eaurora.org,
Avi Shchislowski <avi.shchislowski@....com>,
Bean Huo <beanhuo@...ron.com>, stanley.chu@...iatek.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 02/10] scsi: ufshpb: Add host control mode support to
rsp_upiu
On 2021-03-24 11:31, Zang Leigang wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 10:10:36AM +0200, Avri Altman wrote:
>> In device control mode, the device may recommend the host to either
>> activate or inactivate a region, and the host should follow. Meaning
>> those are not actually recommendations, but more of instructions.
>>
>> On the contrary, in host control mode, the recommendation protocol is
>> slightly changed:
>> a) The device may only recommend the host to update a subregion of an
>> already-active region. And,
>> b) The device may *not* recommend to inactivate a region.
>>
>> Furthermore, in host control mode, the host may choose not to follow
>> any
>> of the device's recommendations. However, in case of a recommendation
>> to
>> update an active and clean subregion, it is better to follow those
>> recommendation because otherwise the host has no other way to know
>> that
>> some internal relocation took place.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Avri Altman <avri.altman@....com>
>> ---
>> drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshpb.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>> drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshpb.h | 2 ++
>> 2 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshpb.c b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshpb.c
>> index fb10afcbb49f..d4f0bb6d8fa1 100644
>> --- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshpb.c
>> +++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshpb.c
>> @@ -166,6 +166,8 @@ static void ufshpb_set_ppn_dirty(struct ufshpb_lu
>> *hpb, int rgn_idx,
>> else
>> set_bit_len = cnt;
>>
>> + set_bit(RGN_FLAG_DIRTY, &rgn->rgn_flags);
>> +
>> if (rgn->rgn_state != HPB_RGN_INACTIVE &&
>> srgn->srgn_state == HPB_SRGN_VALID)
>> bitmap_set(srgn->mctx->ppn_dirty, srgn_offset, set_bit_len);
>> @@ -235,6 +237,11 @@ static bool ufshpb_test_ppn_dirty(struct
>> ufshpb_lu *hpb, int rgn_idx,
>> return false;
>> }
>>
>> +static inline bool is_rgn_dirty(struct ufshpb_region *rgn)
>> +{
>> + return test_bit(RGN_FLAG_DIRTY, &rgn->rgn_flags);
>> +}
>> +
>> static int ufshpb_fill_ppn_from_page(struct ufshpb_lu *hpb,
>> struct ufshpb_map_ctx *mctx, int pos,
>> int len, u64 *ppn_buf)
>> @@ -713,6 +720,7 @@ static void ufshpb_put_map_req(struct ufshpb_lu
>> *hpb,
>> static int ufshpb_clear_dirty_bitmap(struct ufshpb_lu *hpb,
>> struct ufshpb_subregion *srgn)
>> {
>> + struct ufshpb_region *rgn;
>> u32 num_entries = hpb->entries_per_srgn;
>>
>> if (!srgn->mctx) {
>> @@ -726,6 +734,10 @@ static int ufshpb_clear_dirty_bitmap(struct
>> ufshpb_lu *hpb,
>> num_entries = hpb->last_srgn_entries;
>>
>> bitmap_zero(srgn->mctx->ppn_dirty, num_entries);
>> +
>> + rgn = hpb->rgn_tbl + srgn->rgn_idx;
>> + clear_bit(RGN_FLAG_DIRTY, &rgn->rgn_flags);
>> +
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> @@ -1245,6 +1257,18 @@ static void ufshpb_rsp_req_region_update(struct
>> ufshpb_lu *hpb,
>> srgn_i =
>> be16_to_cpu(rsp_field->hpb_active_field[i].active_srgn);
>>
>> + rgn = hpb->rgn_tbl + rgn_i;
>> + if (hpb->is_hcm &&
>> + (rgn->rgn_state != HPB_RGN_ACTIVE || is_rgn_dirty(rgn))) {
>> + /*
>> + * in host control mode, subregion activation
>> + * recommendations are only allowed to active regions.
>> + * Also, ignore recommendations for dirty regions - the
>> + * host will make decisions concerning those by himself
>> + */
>> + continue;
>> + }
>> +
>
> Hi Avri, host control mode also need the recommendations from device,
> because the bkops would make the ppn invalid, is that right?
Right, but ONLY recommandations to ACTIVE regions are of host's interest
in host control mode. For those inactive regions, host makes its own
decisions.
Can Guo.
>
>> dev_dbg(&hpb->sdev_ufs_lu->sdev_dev,
>> "activate(%d) region %d - %d\n", i, rgn_i, srgn_i);
>>
>> @@ -1252,7 +1276,6 @@ static void ufshpb_rsp_req_region_update(struct
>> ufshpb_lu *hpb,
>> ufshpb_update_active_info(hpb, rgn_i, srgn_i);
>> spin_unlock(&hpb->rsp_list_lock);
>>
>> - rgn = hpb->rgn_tbl + rgn_i;
>> srgn = rgn->srgn_tbl + srgn_i;
>>
>> /* blocking HPB_READ */
>> @@ -1263,6 +1286,14 @@ static void ufshpb_rsp_req_region_update(struct
>> ufshpb_lu *hpb,
>> hpb->stats.rb_active_cnt++;
>> }
>>
>> + if (hpb->is_hcm) {
>> + /*
>> + * in host control mode the device is not allowed to inactivate
>> + * regions
>> + */
>> + goto out;
>> + }
>> +
>> for (i = 0; i < rsp_field->inactive_rgn_cnt; i++) {
>> rgn_i = be16_to_cpu(rsp_field->hpb_inactive_field[i]);
>> dev_dbg(&hpb->sdev_ufs_lu->sdev_dev,
>> @@ -1287,6 +1318,7 @@ static void ufshpb_rsp_req_region_update(struct
>> ufshpb_lu *hpb,
>> hpb->stats.rb_inactive_cnt++;
>> }
>>
>> +out:
>> dev_dbg(&hpb->sdev_ufs_lu->sdev_dev, "Noti: #ACT %u #INACT %u\n",
>> rsp_field->active_rgn_cnt, rsp_field->inactive_rgn_cnt);
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshpb.h b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshpb.h
>> index 7df30340386a..032672114881 100644
>> --- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshpb.h
>> +++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshpb.h
>> @@ -121,6 +121,8 @@ struct ufshpb_region {
>>
>> /* below information is used by lru */
>> struct list_head list_lru_rgn;
>> + unsigned long rgn_flags;
>> +#define RGN_FLAG_DIRTY 0
>> };
>>
>> #define for_each_sub_region(rgn, i, srgn) \
>> --
>> 2.25.1
>>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists