linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH v3] dt-binding: leds: Document leds-multi-gpio bindings

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <cce4da5a92d9414e87b6ac6d1d167fac@XBOX01.axis.com>
Date:   Wed, 24 Mar 2021 06:04:01 +0000
From:   Hermes Zhang <Hermes.Zhang@...s.com>
To:     Alexander Dahl <ada@...rsis.com>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
        Dan Murphy <dmurphy@...com>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
CC:     kernel <kernel@...s.com>,
        "linux-leds@...r.kernel.org" <linux-leds@...r.kernel.org>,
        "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v3] dt-binding: leds: Document leds-multi-gpio bindings

> >
> > Notes:
> >     Add maxItems
> 
> What about the other part of the series? I think you should send both
> patches together with an introduction message on both. If you only change
> one patch for a new version spin of the series, just send the other one
> unchanged.
> 
> (It makes no sense to merge the binding as long as the driver is not merged,
> otherwise you would end up with a binding without driver. So keeping them
> together should help reviewers and maintainers.)
> 

Hi Alexander,

The other part is here: https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1399875/, so do you mean I need to combine these two as one commit? Or is there anyway to link them together? Thanks.

I'm first time to commit a new driver, sorry for that.

Best Regards,
Hermes