[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <8E70C497-BDCE-471F-9ECD-790E2FE3B024@holtmann.org>
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2021 08:06:32 +0100
From: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>
To: Daniel Winkler <danielwinkler@...gle.com>
Cc: linux-bluetooth <linux-bluetooth@...r.kernel.org>,
CrosBT Upstreaming <chromeos-bluetooth-upstreaming@...omium.org>,
Miao-chen Chou <mcchou@...omium.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@...il.com>,
Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.dentz@...il.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Bluetooth: Always call advertising disable before setting
params
Hi Daniel,
> In __hci_req_enable_advertising, the HCI_LE_ADV hdev flag is temporarily
> cleared to allow the random address to be set, which exposes a race
> condition when an advertisement is configured immediately (<10ms) after
> software rotation starts to refresh an advertisement.
>
> In normal operation, the HCI_LE_ADV flag is updated as follows:
>
> 1. adv_timeout_expire is called, HCI_LE_ADV gets cleared in
> __hci_req_enable_advertising, but hci_req configures an enable
> request
> 2. hci_req is run, enable callback re-sets HCI_LE_ADV flag
>
> However, in this race condition, the following occurs:
>
> 1. adv_timeout_expire is called, HCI_LE_ADV gets cleared in
> __hci_req_enable_advertising, but hci_req configures an enable
> request
> 2. add_advertising is called, which also calls
> __hci_req_enable_advertising. Because HCI_LE_ADV was cleared in Step
> 1, no "disable" command is queued.
> 3. hci_req for adv_timeout_expire is run, which enables advertising and
> re-sets HCI_LE_ADV
> 4. hci_req for add_advertising is run, but because no "disable" command
> was queued, we try to set advertising parameters while advertising is
> active, causing a Command Disallowed error, failing the registration.
>
> To resolve the issue, this patch removes the check for the HCI_LE_ADV
> flag, and always queues the "disable" request, since HCI_LE_ADV could be
> very temporarily out-of-sync. According to the spec, there is no harm in
> calling "disable" when advertising is not active.
>
> Reviewed-by: Miao-chen Chou <mcchou@...omium.org>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Winkler <danielwinkler@...gle.com>
> ---
>
> net/bluetooth/hci_request.c | 6 ++++--
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/bluetooth/hci_request.c b/net/bluetooth/hci_request.c
> index 8ace5d34b01efe..2b4b99f4cedf21 100644
> --- a/net/bluetooth/hci_request.c
> +++ b/net/bluetooth/hci_request.c
> @@ -1547,8 +1547,10 @@ void __hci_req_enable_advertising(struct hci_request *req)
> if (!is_advertising_allowed(hdev, connectable))
> return;
>
> - if (hci_dev_test_flag(hdev, HCI_LE_ADV))
> - __hci_req_disable_advertising(req);
> + /* Request that the controller stop advertising. This can be called
> + * whether or not there is an active advertisement.
> + */
> + __hci_req_disable_advertising(req);
can you include a btmon trace that shows that we don’t get a HCI error. Since if we get one, then the complete request will fail. And that has further side effects.
Regards
Marcel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists