[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <161657054891.398.5545173778907504540.tip-bot2@tip-bot2>
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2021 07:22:28 -0000
From: "tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner" <tip-bot2@...utronix.de>
To: linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [tip: locking/core] locking/rtmutex: Remove pointless
CONFIG_RT_MUTEXES=n stubs
The following commit has been merged into the locking/core branch of tip:
Commit-ID: 18970ac4e37011fd0c709b6c2a640f01eecf2dd7
Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/18970ac4e37011fd0c709b6c2a640f01eecf2dd7
Author: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
AuthorDate: Tue, 23 Mar 2021 22:30:27 +01:00
Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
CommitterDate: Wed, 24 Mar 2021 08:06:08 +01:00
locking/rtmutex: Remove pointless CONFIG_RT_MUTEXES=n stubs
None of these functions is used when CONFIG_RT_MUTEXES=n.
Remove the gunk. Remove pointless comments and clean up the coding style
mess while at it.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210323213708.305191020@linutronix.de
---
kernel/locking/rtmutex_common.h | 56 ++++++--------------------------
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 45 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/locking/rtmutex_common.h b/kernel/locking/rtmutex_common.h
index badb2a2..0350ae3 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/rtmutex_common.h
+++ b/kernel/locking/rtmutex_common.h
@@ -23,29 +23,25 @@
* @tree_entry: pi node to enqueue into the mutex waiters tree
* @pi_tree_entry: pi node to enqueue into the mutex owner waiters tree
* @task: task reference to the blocked task
+ * @lock: Pointer to the rt_mutex on which the waiter blocks
+ * @prio: Priority of the waiter
+ * @deadline: Deadline of the waiter if applicable
*/
struct rt_mutex_waiter {
- struct rb_node tree_entry;
- struct rb_node pi_tree_entry;
+ struct rb_node tree_entry;
+ struct rb_node pi_tree_entry;
struct task_struct *task;
struct rt_mutex *lock;
- int prio;
- u64 deadline;
+ int prio;
+ u64 deadline;
};
-/*
- * Various helpers to access the waiters-tree:
- */
-
-#ifdef CONFIG_RT_MUTEXES
-
static inline int rt_mutex_has_waiters(struct rt_mutex *lock)
{
return !RB_EMPTY_ROOT(&lock->waiters.rb_root);
}
-static inline struct rt_mutex_waiter *
-rt_mutex_top_waiter(struct rt_mutex *lock)
+static inline struct rt_mutex_waiter *rt_mutex_top_waiter(struct rt_mutex *lock)
{
struct rb_node *leftmost = rb_first_cached(&lock->waiters);
struct rt_mutex_waiter *w = NULL;
@@ -62,42 +58,12 @@ static inline int task_has_pi_waiters(struct task_struct *p)
return !RB_EMPTY_ROOT(&p->pi_waiters.rb_root);
}
-static inline struct rt_mutex_waiter *
-task_top_pi_waiter(struct task_struct *p)
-{
- return rb_entry(p->pi_waiters.rb_leftmost,
- struct rt_mutex_waiter, pi_tree_entry);
-}
-
-#else
-
-static inline int rt_mutex_has_waiters(struct rt_mutex *lock)
-{
- return false;
-}
-
-static inline struct rt_mutex_waiter *
-rt_mutex_top_waiter(struct rt_mutex *lock)
-{
- return NULL;
-}
-
-static inline int task_has_pi_waiters(struct task_struct *p)
-{
- return false;
-}
-
-static inline struct rt_mutex_waiter *
-task_top_pi_waiter(struct task_struct *p)
+static inline struct rt_mutex_waiter *task_top_pi_waiter(struct task_struct *p)
{
- return NULL;
+ return rb_entry(p->pi_waiters.rb_leftmost, struct rt_mutex_waiter,
+ pi_tree_entry);
}
-#endif
-
-/*
- * lock->owner state tracking:
- */
#define RT_MUTEX_HAS_WAITERS 1UL
static inline struct task_struct *rt_mutex_owner(struct rt_mutex *lock)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists